Laserfiche WebLink
i • <br /> Mr. Abel W. Haines, P.E. <br /> August 12, 1991 <br /> Page 2 <br /> 2 . EFFLUENT DISPOSAL - The Draft Final Ground Water FS did not <br /> identify a preferred option for the disposal of the treated <br /> effluent. All of the options evaluated have limitations, <br /> which in some cases may have severe impacts upon the <br /> remediation project. The Department recognizes that Sharpe <br /> has made a diligent effort towards identifying and securing <br /> possible ground water reuse alternatives and that 100% reuse <br /> may be impossible. It appears that it may be impossible, at <br /> Sharpe, to rely solely on one disposal option. Therefore, <br /> the Department will work with Sharpe on the evaluation and <br /> development of an acceptable "disposal network" . <br /> 3 . ARSENIC - Arsenic has been found at numerous locations <br /> through out Sharpe in both the soils and ground water. <br /> majority of the arsenic data is presented as independent and <br /> unrelated information. It is recommended that the Final <br /> Ground Water FS be revised to bring a more cohesive closure <br /> to this issue. Text should be developed which summarizes <br /> and correlates the information. <br /> CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) - As part of the <br /> Record of Decision (ROD) approval process, the Department, a <br /> lead State agency, is responsible for implementing CEQA. Th <br /> Department is currently proposing a negative declaration for the <br /> remediation of the ground water at Sharpe. Enclosed with this <br /> letter is the CEQA "Environmental Information Form" (Appendi H) <br /> (Enclosure 2) which must be completed by the Applicant, i.e. , <br /> Sharpe. Please complete the enclosed Appendix H and return it to <br /> the Department, as soon as possible. Also included for your <br /> reference is Appendix I (Enclosure 3) which will be completed by <br /> the Department. <br /> It is our intent to circulate, for review and comment, the <br /> draft negative declaration concurrently with the public comment <br /> period for the Proposed Plan. Therefore, your timely response <br /> will be greatly appreciated. Additionally, it should be noted <br /> that eleven (11) copies of the Final Proposed Plan should be ',, <br /> provided to the Department. Those copies will be used for <br /> circulation of the draft negative declaration. <br /> CAL-EPA - The State of California recently formed the <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal-EPA) . As part of <br /> the agency reorganization the functions of the Department of <br /> Health Services-Toxic Substances Control Program were transferred <br /> to the newly formed Department of Toxic Substances Control, <br /> separate agency within Cal-EPA. Therefore, references, in the <br />