My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1988-1991
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
ROTH
>
850
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506824
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1988-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2020 3:14:45 PM
Creation date
4/7/2020 2:36:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1988-1991
RECORD_ID
PR0506824
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007648
FACILITY_NAME
DDRW - SHARPES
STREET_NUMBER
850
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ROTH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19802001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
850 E ROTH RD BLDG S-108
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
470
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jim Pinasco <br /> Page 2 <br /> July 5, 1989 <br /> geologist, a certified engineering geologist, or licensed civil <br /> engineer. <br /> Comment 2 : <br /> The proposed action plan should address the fate ofthe <br /> contamination detected in the existing off-site wells (su h as <br /> LM-55 and LM-56) which is down-gradient of the extraction well <br /> network. <br /> Comment 3 : <br /> TSSU does not agree that there should be a gap in the spaci�g of <br /> the extraction wells as shown on Figure 5-1 of the Withdrawl <br /> Evaluation report. As shown on Figure 2-8 of the Pump Test <br /> report, there is ground water contamination in the location where <br /> the gap would exist. in addition, extraction wells should extend <br /> approximately 500 feet farther to the southeast of the proposed <br /> extraction well EW17 . Extraction wells are needed in this area <br /> in order to capture ground water contamination depicted on Figure <br /> 2-8 of the Pump Test report. <br /> Comment 4 : <br /> TSSU questions that the proposed extraction wells could sustain a <br /> pumping rate of 20 gallons per minute as was used in the ground <br /> water model to choose the well spacing in the Withdrawal <br /> Evaluation report. During the 96 hour pumping test perform 'd in <br /> February 1989, there was over 15 feet of drawdown in the existing <br /> extraction well while pumping at 11 gallons per minute. The <br /> proposed extraction wells would be designed very similarly to the <br /> existing extraction well. Thus, TSSU suspects that the proposed <br /> extraction wells may have excessive drawdown and be unable to <br /> sustain a pumping rate of 20 gallons per minute. <br /> Comment 5 : <br /> A capture zone analysis should be performed to evaluate the <br /> extent of influence of the extraction wells. This analysis <br /> should include graphic flow nets in map view and in <br /> cross-sectional view that show the predicted equipotential and <br /> ground water flow lines when the extraction system is operat ng. <br /> Comment 6: <br /> TSSU suggests that additional monitoring/observation wells be <br /> installed at critical locations to confirm that the extraction <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.