My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1992
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
ROTH
>
850
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506824
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2020 2:59:29 PM
Creation date
4/7/2020 2:38:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1992
RECORD_ID
PR0506824
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007648
FACILITY_NAME
DDRW - SHARPES
STREET_NUMBER
850
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ROTH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19802001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
850 E ROTH RD BLDG S-108
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
600
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Work Plan Addendum -3- 21 September 1992 <br /> DDRW, Sharpe <br /> mix area investigation, additional soil samples will be collected to better <br /> define the lateral extent of pesticide contamination north and south of the <br /> ditch. In the investigation of WMU No. 26 for lead and chromium contamination, <br /> approximately ten percent of the field screened in-situ samples will be <br /> collected for laboratory analyses. The Work Plan Addendum does not indicate <br /> whether the soil samples will be analyzed for soluble concentrations of these <br /> contaminants using the Waste Extraction Test (WET) modified for deionized water. <br /> Soluble concentrations are needed to determine if the contaminants remaining in <br /> the soil will pose a threat to the environment (specifically, water quality) . <br /> Most of the existing soils data is for totals concentrations. Sharpe may be <br /> able to use these data to determine if the contaminant concentrations pose a <br /> threat to the environment by one of two methods which are described below. <br /> a. Collect the new samples and analyze for total and soluble concentrations. <br /> For each contaminant of concern, a ratio between total and soluble <br /> concentrations may be developed and used to back calculate soluble <br /> concentrations from the existing total concentration data. <br /> b. Assume that 100 percent of the total concentrations are soluble. Using the <br /> existing data, back calculate the soluble concentrations. <br /> The latter method is not preferred to back calculate soluble concentrations from <br /> total concentrations because it does not represent field conditions and is <br /> generally over estimates the in-situ soluble concentrations. <br /> 3. The Work Plan Addendum establishes cleanup levels for PCBs, total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons (TPHs) and metals, specifically lead and chromium (pages 2-14 and <br /> 4-6) . The Work Plan is not the appropriate document to establish cleanup <br /> levels, but should be proposed in the FS. The proposed cleanup levels are as <br /> follows: <br /> Contaminant Cleanup Level Concentration <br /> PCBs 1 mg/kg <br /> TPHs 100 mg/kg <br /> Lead 200 mg/kg <br /> Chromium 500 mg/kg <br /> The Work Plan Addendum did not provide adequate justification for these proposed <br /> cleanup levels to assure that these concentrations, if left in-place will not <br /> leach and threaten water quality. The cleanup levels for TPH, lead and chromium <br /> are unacceptable. Of particular concern, is the proposed cleanup level for <br /> chromium because 500 mg/kg is the hazardous level for hexavalent chromium. <br /> Hexavalent chromium is considered to be relatively mobile. It is unknown <br /> whether or not the chromium contamination at the site is in a hexavalent form. <br /> We have previously expressed this concern in our 17 April 1992 letter. <br /> 4. Sharpe has attempted to address our concerns regarding the use of soil gas data <br /> to evaluate the extent of VOC contamination in the unsaturated zone. These <br /> concerns were previously discussed in our letters dated 24 July 1991 and <br /> 17 April 1992. Sharpe now proposes to use an organic vapor analyzer (OVA) to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.