Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> Work Plan Addendum -4- 21 September 1992 <br /> DDRW, Sharpe <br /> obtain soils gas data (page 5-5) . However, we are concerned that this method of <br /> analysis will result in false negatives as the retrieval of the sample for OVA <br /> measurement will cause excessive volatilization of the contaminated sample and <br /> will not provide contaminant specific measurements. In-situ soils gas data are <br /> far more representative of actual concentrations present in the unsaturated zone <br /> and are critical for optimal placement of the vapor extraction wells. <br /> In addition, Sharpe also proposes to use soil analytical data to estimate the <br /> efficiency of the VES. It is unclear why Sharpe proposes to use soil analytical <br /> data to assess a remedial action that is designed to extract the vapor phase of <br /> contamination. We believe that soils gas data are needed to appropriately <br /> assess the extent of the vapor phase contamination in the unsaturated zone. We <br /> continue to believe that soils gas data should be used to map the extent of VOC <br /> contamination in the unsaturated zone, as well as, to estimate the efficiency of <br /> the VES. Furthermore, we question whether the costs associated with laboratory <br /> soils analysis will exceed the costs for soil gas surveys over the long-term. <br /> 5. The Draft Work Plan states that additional investigative work in the area of UST <br /> No. 49 is unnecessary. PCBs were found at 12.0 ug/l in the ground water sample <br /> from MW-474A, which exceeds the Primary MCL of 0.5 µg/l . Sharpe's position for <br /> not conducting any additional investigation is supported by stating that the <br /> ground water, which contains PCBs, is being remediated because it is within the <br /> capture zone for the South Balloon ground water treatment system (GWTS) (page <br /> 2-6) . The treatment technology for the South Balloon GWTS is air stripping. <br /> This treatment technology is appropriate for VOCs, but is inappropriate for <br /> PCBs. <br /> Because the ROD for this investigation was postponed until 1994, there is <br /> additional time to assess and monitor for PCB contamination in soils and ground <br /> water. Additional investigation is needed not only in the area of UST No. 49, <br /> but also in the area of UST No. 27 where the highest concentrations of PCBs and <br /> heavy metals were found in ground water. Cleanup levels for PCBs and heavy <br /> metals will need to be established for the 1994 site-wide ROD, in addition to <br /> the selection of an appropriate remedial technology. <br /> In our National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) inspection of the <br /> Interim Remedial Measures (IRMs), conducted on 28 April 1992, we collected <br /> influent and effluent samples from both the North and South Balloon GWTS. PCBs <br /> were not detected in any of the samples. In the renewal of the NPDES permit, we <br /> will require monitoring of PCBs. However, Sharpe should be monitoring for PCBs <br /> prior to the renewal of the permit to assure that PCBs are not entering the IRMs <br /> and possibly causing operational problems. <br /> 6. It remains unclear if background concentrations for metals in soils and ground <br /> water, other than arsenic and possibly selenium, have been determined for the <br /> Sharpe site. If these data have been collected, Sharpe should summarize all of <br /> the background concentrations for each inorganic constituent in a table and <br /> reference the wells from which the samples were collected. <br /> In the Attachment, we have provided general guidance on the considerations for <br /> establishing soil and ground water cleanup levels, the methodologies for <br />