Laserfiche WebLink
from 5 to 10 feet bgs. Soil samples were not collected from the piezometer borings. <br /> Piezometers located along Navy Drive (PS/P-25 through PS/P-27) and the north Time Oil <br /> terminal fence line (PS/P-29 and PS/P-30) did not contain petroleum sheen or <br /> measureable SPH. <br /> 1988: Levine-Fricke excavated several test pits and trenches along Navy Drive in <br /> February 1988 for SPPL, in response to gasoline discovered in the soil at the southwest <br /> corner of the Time Oil terminal (Levine-Fricke, 1988). The trenches and test pits were <br /> excavated to depths of 4 to 8 feet bgs in order to determine if any of the three 10-inch <br /> diameter SPPL underground product supply pipelines located on the east side of Navy <br /> Drive were leaking. SPH was observed in the test pits and trenches along an <br /> approximately 360-foot section of the pipeline easement. Pressure and tracer tests <br /> conducted on the buried pipelines did not identify any leaks. Laboratory results for SPH <br /> samples collected from trenches SP-2 through SP-4 reported the product was an <br /> unweathered (fresh) leaded gasoline product. No SPH was observed at trench SP-1 or <br /> SP-2, and no SPH was observed in piezometers PS/P-26 or PS/P-27. Five 12-inch <br /> diameter PVC product recovery wells (SP-1 through SP-5) were installed in the A Zone <br /> to depths of 6 to 7 feet bgs along the SPPL pipelines at Navy Drive. The wells were <br /> completed using drain rock, and were slotted from about 2 feet bgs to the bottom of each <br /> well. <br /> Time Oil advanced 17 test pits (T-1 through T-17) and installed product recovery <br /> trenches and wells (TO/T-1 through TONT-5, TONT-8, TONT-11, and TO/T-12) in the <br /> southwest portion of the Time Oil terminal in February and March 1988, in response to <br /> the gasoline spill (Time Oil, 1988). The wells were reportedly installed in the A Zone to <br /> 10 feet bgs in February 1988 and constructed using 8-inch diameter PVC well screen and <br /> casing, except for wells TO/'T-3 and TONT-4, which were constructed using 8-inch <br /> diameter metal well screens and casing, with well screens set at 3 to 9 feet bgs. Well <br /> TO/T-14 was reportedly constructed of PVC well casing and screen in March 1988, but <br /> the well diameter, depth, and screen interval were not reported. Time Oil gauged depth to <br /> water and product thickness in wells TO/R-1 through TO/R-6; PS/P26 and PS/P-32; SP-1 <br /> through SP-5; and TONT-1 through TONT-5, TONT-8, TONT-11, TONT-12, and TONT-14 in <br /> February and/or March 1988. <br /> 1992: EMCON advanced soil borings TO/CB-1, TO/CB-2, and TO/CPT-1 in June 1992 <br /> to depths of approximately 22, 14, and 49 feet bgs, respectively (EMCON, 1993). Soil <br /> samples were collected from TO/CB-1 and TO/CB-2 at approximately 5 feet bgs, and a <br /> groundwater sample was collected from TO/CB-1. EMCON installed wells TO/MW-1, <br /> TO/WC-1S, and TO/WC-1M in July 1992 using 2-inch diameter PVC well casing and <br /> screens. TO/MW-1 and TO/WC-1S were advanced in the A Zone to 15 feet bgs and <br /> screened from approximately 5 to 14 feet bgs, and TO/WCAM was advanced in the <br /> B Zone to 30.5 feet bgs and screened from approximately 20 to 30 feet bgs. Figure 14 in <br /> EMCON's 1993 report shows borings TOB-1 and TOB-2 on the west side of Tank <br /> 33006 (Figure 3). Additional information regarding these two soil borings was not found <br /> in the documents made available to ETG for review. A product sheen was noted in wells <br /> Site Characterization Work Plan,Final, May 18,2012 <br /> 1007-012.002 2-7 <br />