Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 5 <br /> PC : 6-1-89 <br /> GP-89-6/ZR-89-9 <br /> Page 1 <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny GP-89-6 and <br /> ZR-89-9 due to the inability to make the required Bases for a <br /> General Plan Map Amendment and Zone Reclassification. <br /> BASIS FOR GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT <br /> The internal consistency of the General Plan is not maintained i <br /> the adoption of the General Plan Map Amendment because the propo <br /> sal is inconsistent with Rural Residential Principles within the <br /> Land Use/Circulation Element of the General Plan. In particular, <br /> Rural Residential Principle No. 3 states, "Future rural residen- <br /> tial development will take place only within the designated areas <br /> Rural Residential Principle No. 1 further restricts rural <br /> residential development by stating, "Rural residential areas <br /> should be kept to a minimum in number and extent . " <br /> BASES FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION <br /> 1 . The proposed zone district is not consistent with the General <br /> Plan because under the adopted Zoning/General Plan <br /> Consistency Matrix, the proposed RR-65 zone is not consistent <br /> with Agriculture, and as stated above, the change to Rural <br /> Residential is not consistent with the General Plan. <br /> 2 . The site of the proposed zone district is not suitable for <br /> the land uses permitted within the proposed zone district <br /> because the RR-65 zone creates the potential for I%-acre lots <br /> and thus the need for public services. <br /> 3 . The proposed zone district is not reasonable and beneficial <br /> at this time because a need for further residential develop- <br /> ment in this area has not been established. An RR-65 zone <br /> would not be beneficial in preserving the agricultural <br /> interests in the area. <br /> 4 . The proposed zone district may have a substantial , adverse <br /> effect on surrounding properties . The Initial Study prepared <br /> for this project concluded that land use conflicts could <br /> occur between residential and agricultural uses . The project <br /> may be growth inducing because it will encourage other pro- <br /> perty owners in the area to submit similar applications. <br /> PROJECT DESCRIPTION <br /> The applicant is proposing a General Plan Map Amendment to change <br /> 17 acres from Agriculture to Rural Residential and a Zone <br />