My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0002453
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
6600
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
UP-88-13
>
SU0002453
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2022 5:21:56 PM
Creation date
4/14/2020 11:41:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0002453
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
UP-88-13
STREET_NUMBER
6600
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
ENTERED_DATE
10/26/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
6600 S AUSTIN RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
444
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mitigation Measure. No specific mitigation measures would be <br /> needed for trip generation. Refer to other mitigation measures below. <br /> Impact 2 - Project Traffic Generation During Construction <br /> The majority of the construction workers are projected to be drawn <br /> from the San Joaquin County area. During the period of construction (10 <br /> months), an average of 30 workers per day are expected at the site. This <br /> would result in approximately 60 auto trips per day due to the <br /> construction employees. Additionally, there would be truck traffic ) <br /> associated with equipment and materials delivery. <br /> The level of auto and truck traffic during construction should be <br /> lower, in terms of total daily traffic volume, than that expected from <br /> the daily on-going facility operation. There would also be a larger <br /> proportion of trucks in the facility's on-going traffic volume than in <br /> the construction traffic volume. <br /> Mitigation Measure. No specific mitigation measure would be needed <br /> for trip generation. Refer to other mitigation measures below. <br /> Impact 3 - Project Trip Distribution <br /> Project traffic (at full operation) has been distributed to the <br /> local roadway system as shown in Table 3.5. Employee trip distribution <br /> was based upon local area population distribution while biomass delivery <br /> truck trip patterns and briquette delivery truck trip patterns were based <br /> upon information from the project applicant regarding available biomass <br /> source areas and briquette delivery patterns. PM peak hour project <br /> traffic is shown distributed to the local roadway system in Figure 3.3. <br /> Mitigation Measure. Refer to mitigation measures listed below for <br /> other identified impacts. <br /> Impact 4 - Project Traffic Impacts <br /> Project traffic would increase existing PM peak hour volumes by the <br /> amounts shown in Table 3.6. While percent increases would be significant <br /> 3-30 <br /> 101-32.R3 4/10/89 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.