Laserfiche WebLink
Impact 6 - On Site Truck Storage <br /> The on-site truck unloading/queuing areas should be adequate to <br /> accommodate the expected rate of vehicle arrivals and departures. Even <br /> if arrivals should peak at twice the average rate (20 per hour, which <br /> would account for the highest arrival rate in the peak hour at a 99 <br /> percent confidence level) , there should be adequate room to accommodate <br /> these vehicles arriving at a peak rate of one truck every three minutes. <br /> Mitigation Measure. None would be necessary. <br /> Impact 7 - Project Access <br /> Project access would be provided via a single driveway on Austin <br /> Road. No acceleration or deceleration lanes have been proposed by the <br /> project applicant along Austin Road at this location. The lack of such <br /> lanes would increase the chances for significantly slowing ambient and <br /> future traffic flow along Austin Road as well as increasing the <br /> possibility of rear end accidents. <br /> Mitigation Measure. Refer to mitigation measures recommended for <br /> Impact No. 4. <br /> Impact 8 - Cumu7ative Development <br /> Traffic impacts have also been determined based upon construction <br /> of other proposed nearby projects. The two major proposed developments <br /> in the immediate vicinity of the project are: <br /> • The Arch Road Industrial Park Units 3 and 4 <br /> • Expansion of the Youth Authority Center by 600 beds <br /> Based upon an EIR prepared for the Industrial Park Units 3 and 4 <br /> (R.C. Fuller Associates 1987) , this development should generate a <br /> combined 5,370 two-way trips during the PM peak traffic hour. The <br /> expanded Youth Authority Center is projected to generate 95 PM peak-hour <br /> trips based upon a 1987 EIR for their proposed expansion (State of <br /> California General Services Office 1987) . Volumes from both projects <br /> combined are shown on Figure 3.3. The Arch Road Industrial Park EIR also <br /> 3-36 <br /> 101-32.R3 4/10/89 <br />