My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0002453
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
6600
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
UP-88-13
>
SU0002453
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2022 5:21:56 PM
Creation date
4/14/2020 11:41:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0002453
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
UP-88-13
STREET_NUMBER
6600
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
ENTERED_DATE
10/26/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
6600 S AUSTIN RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
444
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Impact 3 - Availability of Groundwater <br /> The construction of buildings, roadways and parking areas would <br /> reduce the total ground surface area available for rainfall and runoff <br /> infiltration for replenishment of the groundwater reservoir. However, <br /> the total amount of paved and constructed impervious surface area repre- <br /> sents such a small fraction of the total surface area available for ' <br /> groundwater infiltration that, by itself, the project would not represent . <br /> a significant adverse impact on the replenishment of groundwater in the <br /> area. Furthermore, the proposed unlined retention pond on-site should <br /> contribute to the replenishment of groundwater in the area. <br /> The proposed project would require the extraction of groundwater <br /> for use by employees, for irrigation of proposed landscaping, and for <br /> fire flow purposes. The amount of groundwater needed for the project <br /> would not contribute significantly to the overdraft situation in the <br /> project area. In addition, the water use for the project would be <br /> significantly less than current water requirements for irrigation. <br /> Mitigation Measures. None would be needed because impacts to the <br /> availability of groundwater are not significant. Water quality impacts <br /> to groundwater are addressed in Impact 4 - Water Quality. <br /> Impact 4 - Water Quality <br /> The presence of some clay in the soil may limit the capacity for <br /> septic system uses which could cause a deterioration of shallow groundwa- <br /> ter quality in the project vicinity if the septic system is not properly <br /> designed. If the system is designed to meet any limitations presented by <br /> the area soils, water quality impacts would not be significant. <br /> The potential exists for groundwater contamination and water <br /> quality deterioration from spillage of oil and other materials and the <br /> leaching of materials from the biomass piles. The concrete containment <br /> proposed by the applicant for the waste oil recovery area should substan- <br /> tially reduce the potential for contamination of groundwater. The <br /> biomass piles would not be in a paved or covered area. Therefore, the <br /> potential exists for contamination due to leaching. <br /> 3-43 <br /> 101-45.R4 4/10/89 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.