SU0002453 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

review at the Stockton Public Library. Although the Operation Plan is available at the Library, the Draft Permit and it' s proposed conditions is not. Many of the summaries of the Draft Conditions indicate that the Conditions being considered by the Department of Health Services are simular or identical to the conditions being considered by LAC. It would seem logical to review the DHS conditions to determine their simularity to the LAC conditions. We will attempt to obtain a copy of the DHS conditions to be provided to LAC prior to the June 16 , 1989 meeting. The following are some concerns of the Farm Bureau which relate to specific proposed conditions. Condition No. 4 would limit waste oil collect to San Joaquin County. The County can limit the importation of hazardous material into the County in order to mitigate the impact of such importation and limit such importation to the County and regional ability to absorb hazardous material. Section 25199 .7 (d) ( 2) (A) allows the Committee to assess conditions for the protection of the city or county. Condition No. 4 is directed toward San Joaquin County' s ability to absorb hazardous waste and is allowable pursuant to the Tanner Act. Condition No. 5 is also a valid condition which can be placed pursuant to the Tanner Act. As we state in our letter of June 2 , 1989 , the Draft Environmental Impact Report is inconsistent as to the total waste oil collected per year. This inconsistency makes it even more imperative that the Committee place specific limitation on the amount of oil to be imported. The Draft Environmental Impact Report also conflicts with Condition No. 4 . Condition No. 4 would impose a limitation of San Joaquin County as a source of oil. The Draft Environmental Impact Report appears to agree with this. On Page 2-8 , it states, "Transportation would include collection of used lubricants from area sources and transportation of sludge waste from recycling process to an appropriate disposal site. " The Draft Environmental Impact Report therefore tends to indicate that area sources would be used whereas the LAC condition imposing this is rejected by the Project Sponsors . Lacking from the Environmental Impact Report and any information provided by the Project Sponsors is information concerning furnace size and efficiency. It is impossible for the Committee to determine the amount of oil necessary for the furnaces and therefore the total oil necessary for the entire Project. The Project Sponsors and the lack of the Environmental Impact Report makes it difficult for the Committee to impose Condition No. 5 because it is not being provided with adequate information. Condition No. 6 . The Committee appears to intend to limit the Project Sponsor to accepting oil within the specifications of AB86. The Project Sponsors do not respond directly to this 3