My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008002
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
5606
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541401
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2020 2:57:42 PM
Creation date
4/14/2020 1:19:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008002
RECORD_ID
PR0541401
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0006046
FACILITY_NAME
UNION OIL STATION #5098
STREET_NUMBER
5606
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
5606 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
427
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
h) Are monitoring points distributed adequately in cross section to determine if sufficient air contact is achieved in <br /> all three dimensions? (In most cases, monitoring points set at multiple depths are needed to venfy vertical air <br /> distribution) <br /> i) Are measurements of water table fluctuations made to determine the possible effects on the ISAS system <br /> performance?Are these measurements made with adequate frequency9 <br /> ,1) Have tracer tests been conducted to verify air flow paths and adequate travel tunes/velocities <br /> 5) Performance Analysis Calculations <br /> Every system is different and the evaluation of the performance data must be made with the specific objectives and <br /> system configuration in mind The following are general considerations that are common to most ISAS systems <br /> a) Prepare hydrogeologic cross sections using available well/boring logs, including the spargmg wells, if no cross <br /> sections of the area of concern are available Evaluate the potential for preferential flow paths or hydrogeologic <br /> boundaries not considered in design and which may affect system performance <br /> b) Prepare air flow versus time graphs for each injection well to determine if past flow rates differ significantly <br /> from current conditions <br /> c) Construct ground water concentration versus time graphs for the contaminants of concern at each monitoring <br /> point Have individual monitoring points reached a consistent asymptote on the concentration versus time graph <br /> without significant rebound? ( Significant rebound" might be defined as an increase of 25-50%above the <br /> asymptote concentration value at the time of shutdown of the sparging system) <br /> d) Construct ground water contaminant concentration isopleth maps of the site Do the contaminant concentrations <br /> indicate that the treatment is effective throughout the target zone? <br /> 6) Adequacy of Operations and Maintenance <br /> a) Has the entire system been operating with enough consistency to achieve its objective in a reasonable time? (A <br /> good operational target should be 90%uptime or better) <br /> b) Are the monitoring points constructed to yield reliable results (e g , short screens, checked for <br /> plugging/response)? <br /> 06/07/99 <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.