My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008002
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
5606
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541401
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2020 2:57:42 PM
Creation date
4/14/2020 1:19:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008002
RECORD_ID
PR0541401
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0006046
FACILITY_NAME
UNION OIL STATION #5098
STREET_NUMBER
5606
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
5606 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
427
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
c) Verify that the air flows are balanced if multiple spargmg wells are used <br /> d) Verify that air injection pressures are low enough to avoid fracturing the soil <br /> e) Verify that the contaminant concentrations are sampled and analyzed in accordance with a sampling and analysis <br /> plan designed to assess the system performance Determme if any additional monitoring is needed to evaluate the <br /> operating conditions <br /> f) Are groundwater samples being collected at proper locations(e g, at points at some distance from sparging <br /> wells yet still within the target zone) <br /> 7) Typical Performance Problems <br /> a) Is there evidence of short-circuiting along the well casing,through nearby utility corridors, or through soil <br /> fractures or other subsurface features) This may be due to poor well installation,preferential air flow paths and may <br /> require well replacement or relocation <br /> b) Have contaminant concentrations been declining in most of the target zone9 If concentrations are not declining <br /> significantly,consider the possible existence of additional source zones that may require remedial action,the <br /> likelihood of inadequate air distribution, or preferential air flow paths These conditions may require that additional <br /> wells be installed, air flow rates be increased,efforts be made to verify air flow paths, that ISAS be augmented with <br /> other treatment processes, or that ISAS be replaced by an alternate technology <br /> c) Did concentrations rebound following cessation of sparging? This may be due to short circuiting of air through <br /> the monitoring points(i e ,monitoring well concentrations do not reflect aquifer concentrations), inadequate air <br /> distribution, or ongoing sources Consider replacing monitoring points, increasing sparging well density,increasmg <br /> air flow to each well, or other source removal alternatives <br /> d) Is there good evidence for adequate air distribution in three dimensions based on relatively reliable indicators9 <br /> e) Are the air flows unevenly distributed among the various wells in a multi-well system?Determine if this may be <br /> due to incorrect flow control valve settm2s differences in de>7th to water in various wells, clogging of the wells, <br /> inconsistent well construction,or significantly different pressure drops in certain piping legs <br /> f) Has there been unexpected contamination found outside the target zone or any indication of an unknown source? <br /> (An investigation into another source may be warranted) <br /> 06/07/99 <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.