My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2403
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545603
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2020 4:31:58 PM
Creation date
4/15/2020 4:14:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0545603
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006095
FACILITY_NAME
PETERSON MFG
STREET_NUMBER
2403
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2403 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ADVISORY-ACTIVE SOIL GAS INVESTIGATIONS <br /> • Tracer compounds can cause interference with target analytes; <br /> • Field detectors may produce biased results in the presence of water vapor or <br /> other compounds; <br /> • The tracer compound may be naturally occurring; <br /> • Field detectors may not be routinely calibrated; and <br /> • Pressurized canisters of tracer gas may be dangerous to transport. <br /> 4.2.3 Purge Volume Test <br /> The purpose of a purge volume test is to ensure that stagnant air is removed from the <br /> sampling system and to ensure that samples are representative of subsurface <br /> conditions. The purge volume test should be completed after the shut-in and leak test. <br /> The test well should be located near the contaminant source zone and in a lithologic <br /> unit where soil gas concentrations are anticipated to be elevated. The purge volume test <br /> is conducted by collecting and analyzing a sample for target compounds after removing <br /> one, three and 10 purge volumes. The purge volume test samples should be analyzed <br /> with the same analytical method as the constituents of concern. <br /> One purge volume includes the following volumes: <br /> • The internal volume of tubing; <br /> • The void space of the sand pack around the probe tip; and <br /> • The void space of the dry bentonite in the annular space. <br /> For permanent probes subject to frequent sampling, the purge volume can be reduced <br /> to one tubing volume if sufficient time, typically two weeks, has transpired between <br /> sampling events to allow the filter pack to come into equilibrium with the surrounding <br /> soil and the probe has remained sealed to ambient air. Sample containers are not <br /> included in the purge volume calculation except when non-evacuated glass bulbs are <br /> used. In those instances, the volume of the non-evacuated glass bulbs should be added <br /> to the purge volume to account for mixing and dilution of gasses inside the glass bulb. <br /> Conduct the purge test at the same flow rate and applied vacuum as will be used to <br /> collect the soil gas samples. If the pump is battery-operated, the batteries should be <br /> checked before and during the operation to insure that a proper charge is maintained. <br /> As batteries lose charge the flow rate is lowered, effectively changing the purge rate. <br /> Select the appropriate purge volume based on the highest concentration of the <br /> compound(s) of concern detected during the purge volume test. <br /> To avoid extensive purging for soil gas samples collected at less than five feet bgs, a <br /> default of three purge volumes should be extracted prior to sampling. If VOCS are not <br /> detected in any of the step purge tests, a default of three purge volumes should be <br /> used. <br /> Include the purge test data in the report to support the purge volume selection. The data <br /> set should include the purge volume test as well as the flow rate, vacuum exerted on <br /> the formation, and duration of each purge step. Additionally, dependent on the <br /> objectives of the characterization activities, collecting pneumatic data during the purge <br /> April 2012 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.