My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DUCK CREEK
>
3633
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0513919
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2020 12:20:04 PM
Creation date
4/27/2020 10:46:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
PRE 2019
RECORD_ID
PR0513919
PE
2228
FACILITY_ID
FA0003758
FACILITY_NAME
RYDER TRUCK RENTAL #1071
STREET_NUMBER
3633
STREET_NAME
DUCK CREEK
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
17331001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3633 DUCK CREEK DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
562
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Stacy Rivera <br />San Joaquin County EHD <br />Per notes on the inspection report, these forms were updated during the January 9, <br />2013 inspection. Prior to the January 9, 2014 inspection, Ryder Fuel Services <br />updated this information in the CERS database. <br />#3 Violation text: #201— CCR 2712(b) — Maintenance and monitoring records not <br />maintained 3 years, cathodic protection records for 6 % years, written <br />performance claims pertaining to release detection systems for 5 years, or <br />records of repairs, linings, and upgrades for the life of the tank. Monitoring <br />records include: (1) date and time of all monitoring or sampling; (2) monitoring <br />equipment calibration and maintenance records; (3) results of any visual <br />observations; (4) results of sample analysis performed at a lab or in the field; <br />(5) logs of all readings of gauges or other monitoring equipment, ground water <br />elevations, or other test results; (6) results of inventory readings and <br />reconciliations. Alarm log for the alarms on 1/17/12 (L-12) and 12/25/12 (L-8) <br />were not found on site. These records shall be kept on site for at least 3 years. <br />Immediately locate and maintain the complete alarm log on site and submit <br />copies to the EHD within 30 days of receiving this report. <br />The Designated Operator for this facility is responsible for reviewing the alarm <br />logs during the monthly inspection to ensure all alarms are handled properly. <br />This information is also noted on the monthly inspection form. Copies of the <br />inspection reports for these months are included as part of this response. Also, in <br />speaking with James Shannon, the facility's Service Manager, the alarm logs were <br />reviewed during the January 2014 inspection and no issues were found. <br />#4 Violation text: #301— HSC 25292.1— UST system is not operated to prevent <br />unauthorized release, including spills and overfills. The L-18 alarm occurred <br />on 12/25/12 and was not acknowledged until the 12/27/12 by the designated <br />operator. Facility did not acknowledge the alarm and did not take corrective <br />action. The underground storage tank system shall be operated to prevent <br />unauthorized releases. All alarms must be acknowledged and appropriate <br />action taken. <br />Ryder Fuel Services provides remote monitoring services for this site, including <br />investigating alarms received from the automatic tank gauge at the facility. The <br />alarm in question was received in our office on December 25, 2012; however, due <br />to the holiday, the location was closed and there was no one on site to help <br />investigate the cause of the alarm. On December 26, 2012, Ryder Fuel Services <br />personnel contacted the location and asked them to check the area where the <br />sensor in question was located. Site personnel discovered water in the sump and <br />promptly removed it but did not acknowledge the alarm on the tank gauge. <br />Training regarding alarm acknowledgement has been provided by the Designated <br />Operator. <br />#5 Violation text: #307— HSC 25291(a)(2) — Secondary containment forT <br />system is not tight. The 1/10/12 secondary containment test result 'Se ICED <br />MAR 0 3 2014 <br />ENVIRONMENTAL <br />HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.