Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Stacy Rivera <br />San Joaquin County EHD <br />failure at the reserve diesel fill sump and the used oil fill sump. The 2 fill <br />sumps were repaired, retested and passed on 7/3/12. The secondary <br />containment for the UST system was not tight for 7 months. Avoid further <br />occurrences. <br />Ryder's practice is to make the necessary repairs and retest, if required, as soon <br />after a problem is discovered as possible. Unfortunately, due to some unforeseen <br />circumstances, budget approval for this project took longer than normal. <br />#6 Violation text: #310 — HSC 25291(e) — Water in secondary containment not <br />removed, analyzed and properly disposed of. Liquid was observed in all the fill <br />sumps. If water could enter into the secondary containment by precipitation or <br />infiltration, it must be removed and disposed of properly. Immediately remove <br />this liquid, make a hazardous waste determination per Title 22 hazardous waste <br />regulations, and manage it accordingly. Ensure that all sumps are maintained <br />free of liquid The technician removed the water and put it in the facility's <br />hazardous waste drum. <br />This item was handled during the inspection. <br />#7 Violation text: #313 — CCR 2635(b)(1) — Spill container failed to contain a <br />minimum capacity of five gallons, or failed to provide a means to keep the spill <br />container empty. The reserve diesel and the used oil spill container failed when <br />tested. All spill containers shall have a minimum capacity of five gallons and <br />be capable of containing a spill or overfill until it is detected or cleaned up. <br />Immediately contact a properly licensed, trained, and certified contractor to <br />repair or replace the spill container under permit and inspection of the EHD. <br />Ryder Fuel Services contracted with Balch Petroleum to make the necessary <br />repairs to the spill containers for the reserve diesel and used oil tanks. This work <br />was completed on February 22, 2013. A copy of their invoice is included with <br />this response. <br />Violations from the August 19, 2013 inspection: <br />#1 Violation text: #110 — CCR 66265.52 —contingency plan incomplete. The <br />contingency plan for this facility did not include the descriptions and <br />capabilities of the emergency equipment at the facility, including the cartridge <br />respirators, chemical protective suites, chemical protective gloves, fire <br />extinguishing system, and absorbent. A contingency plan shall include all the <br />following: <br />• Actions facility personnel shall take in response to fires, explosions, and <br />unplanned release to air, soil, or surface water <br />• Arrangements agreed to by local police departments, fire departments, <br />hospitals, cleanup contractors, and state & local emergency re�&w t ms <br />EIVED <br />MAI" 0 3 20114 <br />ENVIRONMENTAL <br />HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br />