Laserfiche WebLink
'4 <br /> 170 ug/L). 3 of the 8 samples (37%) had unac -ptable RPD values and inte:rsziigly in all three <br /> cases reported EPA 8020 values were significantly greater than the 8240 value. The small <br /> number of samples in this class limits any definitive conclusions,however,it appears thus <br /> overestimation of clic NME conc=tradon by EFA method 8020 may occur when gasoline <br /> concentrations are high and MTBE c-oncentradons are low in LUFT ground`nate=samples_ As <br /> discussed above, co-eluting gasoline components present in the LLQ T'ground water sample may <br /> lead to ov==dmatcs of KOBE concentrations by EPA 8020 analysis_ <br /> Finally, 42 samples contained both high concentrations of gasoline (BTEX and/or B compounds <br /> at concentrations greater or equal to 150 ug�L) compounds and high coaccutradoQs of MTBE <br /> (greater than 240 ug/L). Unacceptable RPD values =cased m 43% (18 out of 42 samules). <br /> The in--.ascd level of neon-agr c=E between values;repormd by EPA 8020 and EPA 8240 may <br /> reflect the combined effects of small mors in dilution and calibration and in some cases the <br /> interferent of co-eluting compounds. <br /> • As expec*.ed, False positives ==r-d by EPA 8020 only occurred in samples that contained <br /> elevated concentrations of gasoline components. False negative samples did.OT occjr. <br /> •'The overall accurrznce of false positives by EPA 8020 was low (4% of the samples, 2 out of 50 <br /> _ samples, that contained elevarcd BTEX and/or B cofir-= ations). <br /> • The 2 false positive values detected by EPA 8020 were grouter than 100 ug/L (240 and 5300 <br /> Ug/L). <br /> • Ainoog this data se:.FPA 8020 may tend to produce a ,f' scantly lower analytical value than <br /> EPA 8240 in appmmmareiy 20% of the samples tbat do nor c=tain elevazsd concentrations of <br /> gasoline compounds. <br /> • Overestimation of the MTBE concentradon by EPA-method 8020 may occur when gasoline <br /> concentrations ars high and NNE concentrations are Iow (20 to 170 ug/L) in LUPI'groin, <br /> water samples. <br /> • Based on the data contained in this report,it is recammended that EPA method 8020A (or <br /> 8021 B) continue to be used to duct B=and MTBE compounds in LUFT <br /> samples. ground ware: <br /> • Due to the low level occurrentw of false positives,it is re-comrnended that at leastone sample <br /> per site which was positive for MTBE by EPA method 8020A(or 80218) be analyzed by EPA <br /> method 8240B (or 8260A) to verify the correct identif=a" tion of MTBE in the LUFT ground <br /> water sample (Le. splir samples from a minimum of one well from each release)_ We <br /> recommend that canf=ation analysis be performed for a sample containing the highesr XTBE <br /> concentration from the sum based on:method W20A values. Subsequent comparison of 8020A <br /> and 82AIOB data should be performed in six months to'evaluate whether continued verification <br /> by EPA methods 8240B (or 8260A) is requize& <br /> • We suggest that analytical laboratories per£arm an "interf=nce check" analysis of a 3- <br /> methylpentane and 2-methyipentane standards in the presence and absence of�tZBE. 'Phis test <br /> ill <br /> wevaluate whether these compounds co-elute with w; ME und:r routine c=didorzs usd in <br /> individual laboratories for EPA 8020A analysis_ <br /> I <br /> 3 <br /> ,i <br />