My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_CASE 1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
14800
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545626
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_CASE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:51:34 PM
Creation date
4/29/2020 1:32:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
CASE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0545626
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0000957
FACILITY_NAME
LATHROP GAS & FOOD MART*
STREET_NUMBER
14800
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
19702004
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
14800 S HWY 99 RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Discussions with laboratory analysts and remediation engine.,.-Ts indicate that itis widely believed <br /> that the gmaccst number of false positives will occur when low concentrations (<100 ug/L) <br /> Ivfl'BE are reported by EPA 8020_ This is sugported by recent studies by Mobile Oil and Shell <br /> Development Company which predict thaz false positive detections of MTBE will tend to oc.-.= <br /> when <20-50 ug/L.co'ncerstradcas of MTBE ane repotted by EPA method 8020: The data <br /> analyzed in this report strongiy contradict these expectations. The reported EPA SM <br /> values for the 2 false:positives in this data set are 240 and 5300 ug/L. Therefore, presently. <br /> the reported EPA 8= concentration (above 20`iig/I-) have ao predictive value for <br /> indicating the probability of false positive mis-idt=tifications_ <br /> New samples were obtained nom the well previously repordn a false oositive EP <br /> of 5300 ug/L. Bah GC/PID and GC/,MS anal g A 8020 value <br /> ysis perr"ozmed,ar Lawrez ce Livermore Nadonal <br /> Laboratory al.NL) conf=ied ND Ievels of MTBE. Our analysis also couzfmza�ed the presence o£ <br /> 3etection ornrane, a ga.Soline carrzgotmemmt which can caelum with MTBE.leadinj rn false <br /> detection or overestimation of MTBE concentrations by EPA 8020. 3-me:hylpemmne was also <br /> indeaenderdy demcmd in these samples by Shell Development Company research laboratcuies. <br /> been mi a, this czamQle shows that gasoline c0MV0n rets present in LLAT ground water have <br /> been us-idcntiiied as:MTBE by EPA 8020 analysis. Other laboratories have reported that the <br /> presence of 2-methylpenr2ne in LUFI`ground water;samples can result in false detection of <br /> MZBE_ Therzfom, we suggest that analytical lab 'oratories perform an "inte fenmce died:" <br /> analysis of a 3-rnethylpentane and 2-rnethyipentatie standards in the presence and absence <br /> of MTBE to cYaluate,�whether this compound co-elutes with MTBE under routine <br /> conditions used in their laboratory for EPA 8020"analysis. <br /> It is our opinion that <br /> as.analyatal laboratories optimize conditions to detect and,quantify MTBE <br /> by EPA 8070 in the prseaca of 3- and 2-methyl both the false nvsuives,will decrz3se. In addition e' she number crud coat.-ra=don of <br /> use of a sin 1e column f cheat Stare of California reg*.mlations regnhe <br /> Association f C.slifo=ia Testing nier maples containing gasojine. The <br /> confirmation column for duction of WME is rh�Bs has rhe�Use of a second <br /> number of false positives detected by EPA 8024 (d FE nS vol.gasoline sue 3,my 199 ). Be the <br /> the auadrY of EPA 8020 data may improve due to optirnizarions of GC/PID separation �3ecanse <br /> conditions armdlor the use of it second column, we re mmmeud d=a comparzsoaof E.oA $020 <br /> and 8240 data should be performed in the fumm to evaluate whether trends frorrm!thzs darn. sat <br /> continue. <br /> Agreement of analytical values reported for EPA 8020 and EPA 87�t0: For our analysis, <br /> RPD values greater thea 40% are-_ unaccevtabl deWorusand a r <br /> the values obtained by these tyro anal g ��t dizrere=c between <br /> analytical methods. We reviewed th=e classes of�lTBE dare <br /> samples with ND or low;concentrations of gasoline cointuounds, samples with h g t <br /> concentrations of gssalinc and Iow couceatradaas of,rME, armd samples wir;:t both Izigh <br /> concentrations of gasoline and MTBE. <br /> L-1 gene:=/, we found averment between the MTBE c6nc:rnttations reportzedby bath anethods <br /> was fair for the 48 samples that did not contain elevate conc"mtrations of gasoline cam <br /> 27 had RPD v�neS greater than 40 , (13 of 48 samples cmuainiug ND to 7- ugTL � <br /> and/or 7 ug/L B compounds). lrne=tingly,in the majority of TrX <br /> these cases (9 out g/ BB the <br /> MI=E concenmazion z�epormd by EPA 8Q20 was significantly lowe<than the:es o re <br /> EPA 8240. We have no exp[anation as to why Epi $02U would teed to produce a ported by <br /> anaIxtic'al value than EPA 8240 in $pprozYma.tely 19% or the samples that do not contain <br /> elevated cancenirations-'Of gasoline compounds. <br /> Only 3 samples contained clevazcd concena-ations of gasoline compounds (1372.X and/or 3 <br /> compounds at cax:cenzrauons greater or equal to 200 ug/L) and low c nr-.eons of\,=E (20- <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.