My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_CASE 1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
14800
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545626
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_CASE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:51:34 PM
Creation date
4/29/2020 1:32:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
CASE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0545626
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0000957
FACILITY_NAME
LATHROP GAS & FOOD MART*
STREET_NUMBER
14800
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
19702004
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
14800 S HWY 99 RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14800 W. Frontage Rd (Hwy. 99) - - 2`-- - •----�w4 September 1998 <br /> Manteca, San Joaquin County 'µ <br /> In response to the request by Regional Board staff, APEX submitted the 7 July 1998""Response to Delay <br /> No Further Action Required Decision and Closure Request", on behalf of Moore Petroleum. The report <br /> provides a determination of the mass of contamination remaining on-site, a fate and transport study and <br /> estimate of the contaminant concentrations that may impact the on-site domestic well and nearby off-site <br /> domestic well, and explains why conditions remaining at the site will not adversely impact water quality, <br /> health or other beneficial uses. <br /> Estimates of the mass of contamination remaining!in the subsurface soil and groundwater are as follows: <br /> Contaminant: Mass: ti <br /> MTBE ' `'0.068 lbs. i_ i dissolved in groundwater <br /> 1,2-DCA 0.032 lbs. dissolved in groundwater <br /> 0.01 lbs. t� remaining in soil <br /> TPHdiesel 0.56 lbs. dissolved in groundwater <br /> The estimates for residual soil contamination are based on the analytical results for the 29 August 1997 <br /> sampling event. 1,2-DCA was the only contaminant detected above the laboratory reporting limits <br /> during this sampling event, therefore, based on the assumptions, this was the only contaminant used in <br /> the mass balance calculation for soil. �'II <br /> The residual contaminant mass calculation for groundwater, is based on the analytical results of <br /> groundwater sampling performed on 21 November 1997. MTBE, 1,2-DCA and TPHd, were the only <br /> contaminants detected above the laboratory reporting limits during the indicated sampling event. Based <br /> on the assumptions, these were the only contaminants used in the mass balance calculation. <br /> The driller's log for the new on-site domestic welfwas provided. The log suggests thatinterbedded sand <br /> and clay is present below the site to a depth of approximately 175 feet bgs. Between 175 feet and 278 <br /> . feet bgs, the-log-documents-a.clay-unit that is,appr`oximately 100 feet_thick, with one.2:�foot_unit of.sand ._ <br /> between 229 and 231 feet bgs:Below 278 feet bgs;the boring log reports interbedded sand and clay. The <br /> 6-inch diameter domestic well is screened from 340 to 3. 60 feet bgs. A bentonite sanitary seal is present <br /> from 220 feet bgs to the surface. I <br /> The new on-site domestic well was drilled between 8 and 13 October 1997. On 13 October 1997, the <br /> well was developed, static water level was measured, and the well was sampled. Analytical results of <br /> this sample detected 1200 ppb TPHg and 3.4 ppb total Xylenes. The well was resampled on <br /> 21 November 1997. No contaminants were detected above their respective reporting limits during the <br /> November sampling event. On 1 September 1998, I called Tom Landwehr of APEX, requesting an <br /> explanation for the contaminant concentrations in the new well during the 13 October 1998 sampling <br /> event. During the telephone conversation, 'Mr. -Landwehr attributed the contamination to the well <br /> developer's pump and/or drilling fluids, and indicated that the 21 November 1997 sampling results <br /> support this conclusion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.