Laserfiche WebLink
.f I <br /> R <br /> !r <br /> Lawrence Uvermcre Natiorml Labcrdtar'y <br /> To: James G. Giannocculos <br /> State Waxer Resourcys Control Board <br /> From: Anne Happel,Ph.D. <br /> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, L-530 <br /> Environmental Resraration Division <br /> 7000 East Ave.,P.Q. Box 808 <br /> Livermom CA 94550 <br /> Date: August 6, 1996 <br /> SUR.TFC <br /> Comparison of EPA 8020 and EPA 8240 Aaalydcal Results far Measuzernent of Methyl Tertiary <br /> Buryi Ether(MTBE) in Ground Water Samples from LLFT Sites. <br /> MEJHOUS <br /> We have reviewed MTBE ground water dam submitred;to us by scve:al oil companies, including <br /> Shell., Texaco, ARCO, and Unocal. We have evaluared.dam fecal ground water samples <br /> concun=dy analyzed for FTSE using EPA methods 8020 and 8240. In arc e:m compare the <br /> detection and quantification of MTBE by these two methods,vire restdczed our study to a total of <br /> 98 ground water samples that reported IME values greater or equal to 20 ug/L by EPIA <br /> method 8020 and/or VACL This data was cvaluzzed for the occurrence of etc positives and for <br /> the level of a&rxmcnt be ween values mported by each of these analytical met&ods. The MTBE <br /> values detuted by EPA methods 8020 and 8240 were compared without rhe assumption of <br /> knowledge of the lase value by calculating the Relative P=r-=t Difffimence (RPD). In dais reper.., <br /> RPD values gr==than 40% indicate an unacceptable level of disparity between the values <br /> obtained by these rwo anaiydcal methods. <br /> RESULTS 211d DISC11MON <br /> Occurrence of False Positives There has leen much discussion as to whether EPA method <br /> WM is adequate for determining M73E concentrations in LUFT ground water samples. <br /> Anecdotal information from analytical laboratories and remedianou engu== revaI false <br /> positive detectious of MME by EPA 8020. -%Ise uositive cases oc.-ter when EpX Sb20 analyst.:, <br /> a gas chrornatography/photo ionization detector(Gt?M) method,detect WME, wvhile <br /> confirmation by EPA 8240, a gas chromanography/mass,saectromcc y (GC/NO) method,, <br /> dctcrtnines MTBE to be non-detect (ND). These this-idendf=zioas of 1rinE by EPA 8020 <br /> analysis are amibuted to rhe presence of other hydrocarbons <br /> clute with NNE under standar*] (gasoline components) coat may ca- <br /> G ./PM coalitions used for BTEX analysis. <br /> In this data set, the overall occurrence of false positives by EPA 9020 was low. Among the toW <br /> 98 MTBE positive samples only 2 false positives wee repormd (71% of samples with MTBE <br /> cowentrations >20 ug/L). As exoected., false posinvcs only oc.^tiered in samples that ccntained <br /> elevated cnncrratradons of gasoline components (Table 1). False positives occurred in 4%, of <br /> the samples (2 out of 50 samples) that contained B= and/or B compounds at <br /> concentrations greater or eq=l to 150 ug/L. No false aega ive samples occ-,tr:.�in this dada <br /> ser. <br /> M Egos+G�prx�ng+ •Urarersiq of C,�fC.ri.•P.Q 8ar8G1B Lnerrraa►e,Car�rrrs SLSo r-Taiwhwre{sr.S7�2r r7o0-�wr 97G,�9r&�GCL:l LYXR <br /> I <br />