Laserfiche WebLink
1 , <br /> 31 October 2005 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 03-1080 <br /> ' Page 8 of 10 <br /> TPH-g and TPH-d fractions would be mainly in the aliphatic fractions For the more conservative <br /> t fate and transport analysis, AGE elected to spread the TPH-g'and TPH-d concentrations equally <br /> across the aliphatic TPH spectrum,although aged TPH-g fractions should be localized in the higher, <br /> less-volatile portion of the TPH spectrum (see Appendix E, Appendix G) <br /> ' Utilizing RISC Workbench, AGE conducted a 100-year fate and transport study to analyze the, <br /> potential impact of contaminated soil and ground water at the dispenser D 1 location to any shallow <br /> ' ground water well located approximately_45 feet down-gradient of the dispenser location-The fate <br /> and transport model—used in the study was based on the site conceptual model soil profile of <br /> dominantly sandy silt/silty sand soil separated by an intervening 5-foot clayey silt and silt interval�- <br /> at 15 feet bsg (Figures 3 and 4} _The contaminant source is located in the vadose zone, since first- <br /> encountered ground water occurs at approximately 30 feet bsg <br /> AGE analyzed the fate of contaminant concentrations in soil beneath dispenser DI utilizing a vadose <br /> zone_contaminant transport model In this model,the mass of chemicals in the source is assumed to <br /> be leached to the water table due-o infiltration Default RISC Workbench values were selected for <br /> ' a sandy silt soil with an intervening silty claylaver Utilizing ground-water infiltration rate equations <br /> of Connor and others(107T,an averaged infiltration rate of 1 06 inch/year was calculated for sandy <br /> I <br /> silt-type soils,based on a City of Stockton average rainfall of L7 3 nches/year,the actual infiltration <br /> rate is probably considerably lower since the site is covered by asphalt and concrete Model <br /> parameters are provided in Appendix G <br /> ' The vadose zone fate and transport model predicts that there should not be any impact to ground <br /> water at the dispenser D1 location from the aged petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted soil (Table 5, <br /> ' Appendix G), there should be no impact to any down-gradient wells <br /> ' 8.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> , <br /> Based upon a review of site assessment activities at the Lathrop Gas and Food Mart to date, AGE <br /> ' concludes <br /> • The general soil profile at the dispenser location consists dominantly of silty sand and sandy " <br /> ' silt, interbedded with finer-grained intervals of clays and silts at approximately 15 feet, <br /> 25 feet and 35 feet bsg (Figures 3 and 4) <br /> J <br /> • Ground water depths at the site have fluctuated between 30 feet and 35 feet bsg, ground <br /> water flow direction has generally been toward the northeast, although easterly and <br /> southwesterly flow directions have been recorded <br /> ' Contaminants of concern (CDCs) detected in soil at the dispenser location include TPH-g, <br /> TPH-d, ethylbenzene, xylenes, 1,2-DCA, and TBA at maximum concentrations of <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmentai,Inc <br /> 1 <br />