Laserfiche WebLink
1 , <br /> Ile 31 October 2005 # <br /> AGE-NC Project No 03-1080 ` l <br /> Page 9 of 10 <br /> 6,100 mg/kg, 8,500 mdg, 11 mg/kg, 337 mg/kg,µ0 019 mg/kg, and l 16 mg/kg, <br /> ' W respectively However,the extent of contamination appears limited,AGE calculated that an <br /> estimated 52 lbs, or 7 8 gallons, of total petroleum hydrocarbons appear to remain in <br /> approximately 940 ft3 of predominantly silty sand/silt soil <br /> ' In AGE's site conceptual model, the distribution of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil and <br /> ground water indicates an apparent release(s)In the area of former dispenser D 1,which then <br /> migrated vertically through the upper silty sand/sandy silt until encountering the less <br /> permeable clay/silty clay interval at approximately 15 feet bsg Further vertical migration <br /> appeared to be retarded by this less-permeable interval, concentrations of COCs were note <br /> detected in soil below this Interval, although the underlying ground water was impacted - <br /> ' According to the analytical laboratory,the gas chromatograms Indicated that the petroleum 15 V)nor o <br /> hydrocarbons were not from a recent release(s),but remnants of aged or degraded fuel AGE ${" <br /> speculates that the releases probably occurred prior to 1988, when site subsurface <br /> 1 , p ( ) p Y <br /> Investigation began for the leaking USTs, when compared to the high concentrations of <br /> BTEX compounds In ground water at the time of the UST Investigation between 1992 and <br /> ' 1994,there are only xylenes,with occasional occurrences of ethylbenzene,In soil and ground <br /> water at the dispenser location Additional evidence of an older release Is the presence of the <br /> MTBE degradation product TBA, associated with the low MTBE concentration In sO1 <br /> ',• Fate and transport modeling using very conservative site conditions predicts that there should <br /> not be any impact to ground water at the dispenser D1 location from the aged petroleum <br /> ' hydrocarbon-Impacted soil The high concentrations of TPH-g and TPH-d In ground water <br /> beneath the dispenser location may be remnant, degraded fuel left in place at the time of the <br /> original site closure In 1998 _ <br /> ' One on-site domestic well and one off-site domestic well are located at greater than 100 feet <br /> from the dispenser location, after 1997,the original wells were destroyed and the new wells <br /> were Installed to deeper depths to avoid any possible contamination from the site UST <br /> r release Based on the results of the fate and transport study of remaining petroleum-Impacted <br /> soil at the dispenser location, it is unlikely that these wells are contaminated by Impacted r <br /> ground water from the site <br /> • The nearest surface water feature to the site Is the San Joaquin River, located approximately <br /> ' 5 miles west of the site It Is unlikely that water In Smith Canal is contaminated by Impacted <br /> ground water from the site <br /> r" <br /> 9.0. RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> ' Based upon petroleum hydrocarbon distribution patterns and migration pathways Identified In the <br /> N site conceptual model,AGE recommends no further action In regards to the current Investigation In <br /> ' Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />