Laserfiche WebLink
S9200-06-82 ATTACHMENT D T8 CCR§oz07. Cadmium -Appendix A <br /> regarding the degradation of 132-M, workers with acidic urine(pH<6)might have b2-M levels <br /> that are within the "normal" range when in fact kidney dysfunction has occurred(Ex. L-140-1) <br /> and the low molecular weight proteins are degraded in acid urine. Thus, it is very important that <br /> the pH of urine be measured,that urine samples be buffered as necessary (See Appendix F.),and <br /> that urine samples be handled correctly, i.e., measure the pH of freshly voided urine samples,then <br /> if necessary, buffer to pH> 6(or above for shipping purposes), measure pH again and then, <br /> perhaps, freeze the sample for storage and shipping. (See also Appendix F.) Second,there is <br /> debate over the pathological significance of proteinuria, however, most world experts believe that <br /> 132-M levels greater than 300 pg/g Cr are abnormal (Elinder, Ex. 55, Friberg, Ex. 29). Such levels <br /> signify kidney dysfunction that constitutes material impairment of health. Finally, detection of B2- <br /> M at low levels has often been considered difficult, however, many laboratories have the <br /> capability of detecting excess 132-M using simple kits, such as the Phadebas Delphia test,that are <br /> accurate to levels of 100 µg B2-M/9 Cr U(Ex. L-140-1). <br /> Specific recommendations for ways to measure B2-M and proper handling of urine samples to <br /> prevent degradation of 132-M have been addressed by OSHA in Appendix F, in the section on <br /> laboratory standardization. All biological samples must be analyzed in a laboratory that is <br /> proficient in the analysis of that particular analyte, under paragraph(1)(1)(iv). [See Appendix F]. <br /> Specifically, under paragraph(1)(1)(iv),the employer is to assure that the collecting and handling <br /> of biological samples of cadmium in urine (CdU),cadmium in blood(CdB), and beta-2 <br /> microglobulin in urine(132-M)taken from employees is collected in a manner that assures <br /> reliability. The employer must also assure that analysis of biological samples of cadmium in urine <br /> (CdU),cadmium in blood(CdB), and beta-2 microglobulin in urine (132-M)taken from employees <br /> is performed in laboratories with demonstrated proficiency for that particular analyte. (See <br /> Appendix F.) <br /> 3. Lung and Prostrate Cancer <br /> The primary sites for cadmium-associated cancer appear to be the lung and the prostate(L-140- <br /> 50). Evidence for an association between cancer and cadmium exposure derives from both <br /> epidemiological studies and animal experiments. Mortality from prostrate cancer associated with <br /> cadmium is slightly elevated in several industrial cohorts,but the number of cases is small and <br /> there is not clear dose-response relationship. More substantive evidence exists for lung cancer. <br /> The major epidemiological study of lung cancer was conducted by Thun et al., (Ex. 4-68). <br /> Adequate data on cadmium exposures were available to allow evaluation of dose-response <br /> relationships between cadmium exposure and lung cancer. A statistically significant excess of <br /> lung cancer attributed to cadmium exposure was observed in this study even when confounding <br /> variables such as co-exposure to arsenic and smoking habits were taken into consideration(Ex. L- <br /> 140-50). <br /> The primary evidence for quantifying a link between lung cancer and cadmium exposure from <br /> animal studies derives from two rat bioassay studies; one by Takenaka et al., (1983),which is a <br /> study of cadmium chloride and a second study by Oldiges and Glaser(1990)of four cadmium <br /> compounds. <br /> Based on the above cited studies,the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)classified <br /> cadmium as "B1", a probable human carcinogen, in 1985 (Ex. 4-4). The International Agency for <br /> Research on Cancer(IARC) in 1987 also recommended that cadmium be listed as "2A", a <br /> probable human carcinogen (Ex. 4- 15). The American Conference of Governmental Industrial <br /> Hygienists (ACGIH) has recently recommended that cadmium be labeled as a carcinogen. Since <br /> 1984,NIOSH has concluded that cadmium is possibly a human carcinogen and has recommended <br /> that exposures be controlled to the lowest level feasible. <br /> 4. Non-carcinogenic Effects <br /> Stockton 6-Lane,Task Order No.82 Caltrans Contract 06A1141,EA 10-03A1001 <br /> Project No.S9200-06-82 Page D-5 of 6 December 2009 <br />