Laserfiche WebLink
• � Page ] of 3 <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 9:48 AM <br /> To: 'Brian.Westhoff@stantec.com' <br /> Subject: FW: ARCO 443 <br /> Brian, <br /> I finished my eval of the TRAP. I'll allow the IRAP on Geotracker to stay 'received' <br /> and won't deny it. <br /> But I dissapproved the IRAP as inadequate. An addendum is needed. My draft <br /> denial letter is on the bosses desk for signature. Once signed, it'll be mailed out. <br /> You should get it next week at the soonest. <br /> I will allow 6-months of batch GWE for now. Monthly status reports are due on <br /> Geotracker for my review PRIOR to the subsequent/next months' GWE. You'll need <br /> to provide technical justification after six months that it's effective at reducing gw <br /> contam. <br /> An addendum that shows MW-8 construction specs (materials, methods, <br /> dimensions) is due on GT for my review by Sept 12. Include a schedule for the <br /> batch GWE in the addendum. <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 10:30 AM <br /> To: 'Westhoff, Brian' <br /> Subject: RE: ARCO 443 <br /> well, if I don't deny it, then the public has to know to LOOK for an addendum.. <br /> I've found that denying a plan with missing items allows for you to just resubmit a <br /> complete ONE... <br /> I'll let you know as I get back to the plan. <br /> other priorities have popped up that need my attention. <br /> just hold off until you hear from me. <br /> From: Westhoff, Brian [mailto:Brian.Westhoff@stantec.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 10:25 AM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH1 <br /> Cc: Benkosky, Rusty; Morescalchi, Sergio <br /> Subject: RE: ARCO 443 <br /> Hi Mike, <br /> We would be happy to draft a follow up addendum addressing your concerns below and deliver it to you <br /> before August 15, 2008. We don't see a need to deny the report in Geotracker since it will be referenced in <br /> 8/8/2008 <br />