Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Quarterly Monitoring Report January 1948 <br /> Canepa s Cu Wash <br /> 248 E Park St Stockton CA <br /> • Mnrch 121998j, 2 <br /> Page 2 <br /> • Groundwater Elevation The average depth to groundwater was approximately 29 7 feet below the <br /> ground surface (bgs) at the site The groundwater elevation ranged from 19 31 to 17 74 feet below <br /> mean sea level (bmsl) Groundwater elevation contours are shown in Figure 3, Appendix A <br /> 3 QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING-JANUARY 1998 <br /> The work conducted during the quarterly groundwater monitoring was in accordance with the approved <br /> protocol formerly established at the site The scope-of-work presented in the report was approved by Mr <br /> Ronald Rowe of the PHS/EHD <br /> On January 22, 1998, Condor personnel made field observations and collected groundwater samples from six of <br /> the seven monitor wells at the site (see Figure 2, Appendix A, for well locations) MW-4 was located behind a <br /> gate that was unexpectedly locked during the monitoring event The well was, therefore, not sampled All field <br /> equipment was decontaminated in the field with a solution of laboratory-grade, non-phosphate detergent and <br /> hydrocarbon-free water and rinsed with hydrocarbon-free water prior to use in each well All field instruments <br /> were calibrated to the manufacturer's recommended standards The water level in each well was measured to <br /> I the nearest 0 01 foot with a standard battery-operated, flat-tape, water-level meter A new, disposable, <br /> polyethylene bailer was lowered into each well to collect a field-inspection sample rhe bailer Sample was <br /> inspected for floating product, sheen, discoloration and/or odor Floating product was not observed in any of <br /> • the monitor wells during the groundwater sampling Water levels in the wells were above the top of the well <br /> screens, however Petroleum odors were detected in MW-2, MW-5, and MW-7 <br /> Each well was purged with a dedicated bailer until at least three well-casing volumes of water were removed <br /> and until the pH, specific conductance, and temperature of the water had stabilized Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Field Forms are included in Appendix B Prior to sampling, the water was allowed to recover to at least 80% of <br /> the pre-purge water level The purge water was discharged to 55-gallon drums and left on site to await <br /> disposal For each well <br /> IA groundwater sample was collected with a disposable, one-time-use, polyethylene bailer The <br /> sample was transferred to three (3) 40-m1 glass VOA vials fitted with Teflon-Imed caps Each <br /> vial was inverted and tapped to assure that no air bubbles were present <br /> • Each vial was labeled and placed in a cooler chilled with ice and delivered under chain-of <br /> I custody procedures to GeoAnalytical Laboratories, Inc, in Modesto, California, within 24 <br /> hours of sample collection The results of laboratory analyses are discussed in Section 4 2 <br /> I4 INVESTIGATION RESULTS <br /> 4 1 Laboratory Analyses <br /> The groundwater samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons, quantified as gasoline (TPH-G) by <br /> Method 5030/LUFT and for benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method 602 <br /> I �� CONDOR <br />