Laserfiche WebLink
QUARTERLY MONITORING REPORT APRIL 1997 <br /> CANEPA S CAR WASH <br /> 248 E Park Street Stockton CA <br /> Apn1:'I, 1997 <br /> 3.0 QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING - APRI=L, 1997 <br /> The work conducted during the quarterly groundwater monitoring was in accordance with the <br /> I approved protocol formerly established at the site The scope-of-work presented in the proposal was <br /> approved by Mr Ronald Rowe of the PHS/EHD <br /> On April 2 and 3, I997, Condor personnel made field observations and collected groundwater <br /> samples from the seven (7) monitor wells at the site (see Figure 2, Appendix A for well locations) <br /> The order of sampling was MW-2, MW-7, MW-5, MW-1, MW-6, MW-4, and MW-3 All field <br /> I equipment was decontaminated in the field with a solution of laboratory-grade, non-phosphate <br /> detergent and hydrocarbon-free water and rinsed with hydrocarbon-free water prior to use in each well <br /> All field instruments were calibrated to the manufacturer's recommended standards The water level <br /> in each well was measured to the nearest 0 01 foot with a standard battery-operated, flat-tape, water- <br /> level meter A new, disposable, polyethylene bailer was lowered into each well to collect a field- <br /> inspection sample The bailer sample was inspected for floating product, sheen, discoloration and/or <br />' odor Floating product was not observed in any of the monitor wells during the groundwater <br /> sampling However, water levels in the wells were above the top of the well screens A strong <br /> petroleum odor was detected in MW-2 and MW-5 <br /> Each well was purged with a dedicated bailer until at least three well-casing volumes of water <br /> were removed and until the pH, specific conductance, and temperature of the water had stabilized <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Field Farms are included in Appendix B Prior to sampling, the water was <br /> allowed to recover to at least 80% of the pre-purge water level The purge water was discharged to <br /> 55-gallon drums and left on site to await disposal For each well <br /> IA groundwater sample was collected with a disposable, one-time-use, polyethylene <br /> bailer The sample was transferred to two (2) 40-m1 glass VOA vials fitted with <br /> Teflon-lined caps Each vial was inverted and tapped to assure that no air bubbles <br /> were present <br /> • Each vial was labeled and placed in a cooler chilled with ice and delivered under <br /> chain-of-custody procedures to GeoAnalyticaI Laboratories, Inc , in Modesto, <br /> California, within 24 hours of sample collection The results of laboratory analyses <br /> are discussed in Section 4 2 <br /> 4 0 INVESTIGATION RESULTS <br /> 4 1 Laboratory Analyses <br /> IThe groundwater samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons, quantified as <br /> gasoline (TPH-G) by Method 5030/LUFT and for benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene (BTEX) <br /> and methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) by EPA Method 602 EPA Method 8260 was used to attempt <br /> confirmation of MTBE in the sample from MW-2 The laboratory certificates of analyses and chain- <br /> of-custody are located in Appendix C <br /> Page -2- Ntwlo', <br /> i� CONDOR <br />