My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009654
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PARK
>
248
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0542235
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009654
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2020 3:18:49 PM
Creation date
5/4/2020 2:51:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009654
RECORD_ID
PR0542235
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024262
FACILITY_NAME
CANEPA CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
248
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
PARK
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13906035
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
248 E PARK ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Canepa Is Car Wash <br /> 248 E Park Street, Stockton, CaWornia January 14, 1994 <br /> Interim Status Report on Phase II Investigation Page: 4 <br /> The laboratory samples did not have head space and were immediately sealed in their liners <br /> using aluminum foil-lined plastic caps All soil samples were properly labeled with project <br /> name!number, date and time collected, sample identification and analysis requested Samples <br /> were additionally sealed in air-tight plastic bags before being refrigerated for delivery to the <br /> laboratory, and were under no circumstances opened by anyone other than laboratory <br /> personnel. Chain of Custody records were maintained at all times The remaining samples <br /> were removed from their liners and used as an aide to the on-site geologist in logging the <br /> material at that depth <br /> Soil samples collected for laboratory analysis were analyzed using EPA method 8020 for <br /> BTX&E, method 5030/LUFT for total petroleum hydrocarbons - gasoline, and method 3550 <br /> for total petroleum hydrocarbons - diesel The State certified laboratory analyzing the soil <br /> samples was Geo-Monitor, Inc , of Hesperia, California, a State certified laboratory <br /> 3.5 Groundwater Sampling <br /> A travel blank provided by the laboratory accompany the sample vials from the time they are <br /> picked up from the lab to the time they are delivered to the lab This travel blank was listed on <br /> the Chain of Custody but was analyzed only if all samples contain: the same contaminants <br /> All sampling equipment including the pump, bailer, and cables, used by sampling personnel, <br /> was disassembled, if appropriate, and steam-cleaned prior to commencement of sampling <br /> These procedures were also followed between each well, sampling point, and at the end of the <br /> sampling day De-romzed or orgaruc-free water (also provided by the laboratory) was then <br /> introduced into the pump or bailer as a final stage of cleaning This water was then pumped or <br /> gently poured into sample vials to be used as pump or bailer blanks. These blanks were tested <br /> only if their corresponding samples were found to contain contaminants. <br /> Immediately prior to sampling, water levels and well depth measurements were taken in all <br /> wells at the site Each well was evacuated using a stainless steel bladder pump, which does not <br /> introduce air into the water column, or a Teflon bailer The pH, temperature, and electrical <br /> conductivity of the water was monitored as the well was evacuated These parameters were <br /> noted on Field Logs (Table 3 &Appendix D) Instruments calibrated to known standards were <br />' used to monitor these parameters. At least five well volumes were evacuated from each well, <br /> and more, if necessary, until the above parameters had stabilized Wells that are de-watered <br />' before evacuation of five well volumes had been accomplished were sampled upon eighty <br /> percent recovery of the uutial water level. The wells or other sampling points were sampled in <br /> order of the least to the most contaminated, as best known or estimated The samples were <br /> pumped from a stainless steel bladder pump or carefully poured from a Teflon bailer into clean <br /> glass vials with Teflon-lined screw caps and half gallon plastic containers provided by the <br /> laboratory Care was taken to ensure that no air space existed in the vials by inverting to check <br />' for bubbles and re-sampling as necessary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.