Laserfiche WebLink
Can epa Is Car Wash <br /> 248 E Park Street, Stockton, California January 24, 1994 <br /> IInterim Status Report on Phase II Investigation Page. 3 <br /> 3.2 Well Construction <br /> All materials used in well construction were thoroughly cleaned prior to mtroduction into the <br /> boring A bentonite or eement/bentonrte grout was placed at the bottom of the borings as <br /> necessary. After the seal was allowed to set long enough to support the weight of the casmg, a <br /> 2-mch diameter PVC well casing with end cap and factory perforations for placement in the <br /> saturated zone (taking into account seasonal var=on) was placed in the boring The screen <br /> and filter pack sizes are as noted in the Bonng/Well Completion Logs The casing and end <br /> caps were threaded or,joined by stainless steel screws, no PVC cement was used The filter <br /> pack extends two feet above the perforated zone A bentonite seal two to three feet thick was <br /> placed in the annular space above the filter pack followed by a cement/bentorute grout to the <br /> Isurface <br />' 3.3 Well Development and Sampling <br /> The wells were developed until the well water appeared clear of sediment, or until an <br /> appmprc ite number of well volumes (based upon the Judgment of the responsible professional) <br /> had been evacuated The water produced during well development was contammued and left <br /> on-site in 55-gallon drums, or other suitable containers for disposal as hazardous waste of <br /> deemed necessary upon receipt of laboratory results Disposal will be the responsibility of the <br /> client unless other arrangements have been made The wells were allowed to stabilize for <br /> twenty-four hours pnor to sampling <br /> All soil and groundwater samples were properly labeled with date collected, project number, <br /> sample coordinator, and sample identification Field records documented the above <br /> Iinformation and other significant data, such as names of on-site personnel, sampling methods, <br /> date and time of sampling, the number of well volumes removed before sampling, <br /> preservatives added (if any), and any filtration performed on samples <br /> The samples were refrigerated immediatelyfor delivery to the laboratory and were under no <br /> �}' rY <br /> circumstances opened by anyone other than laboratory personnel Chain of Custody records <br /> were maintained at all times (Appendix A & B) <br /> 3.4 Soil Sampling <br /> All soil sampling equipment was thoroughly steam-cleaned before and between sampling to <br /> Prevent cross-contamination. Relatively undisturbed soil samples were taken at fifteen feet and <br /> every five foot interval thereafter in order to evaluate the subsurface materials The soil <br /> samples were taken using a California Modified Split Spoon sampler with brass liners The <br /> sampler was driven continuously by a 140 pound wire-line hammer repeatedly falling 30 <br /> inches The blow counts necessary to drive the sampler were recorded on the boring log for <br /> Ieach 6 inch interval to help evaluate the consistencies of the materials <br />