Laserfiche WebLink
` Work Plan <br /> Canepa's Car Wasb <br /> Ma) 28, 1997 <br /> IPage-3- <br /> through MW-8 (Figure 2, Appendix A) Moderate concentrations of gasoline were detected in the soil <br />' from MW-6 at 50 and 55 feet bgs and from MW-7 at 50 feet bgs Low to elevated concentrations of <br /> TPH-G and BTEX were detected in groundwater samples collected from MW-6, MW-7, and MW-8 <br /> A summary of the soil and groundwater analytical data are contained in Phase Il Site <br /> Chaiactei ization, by WHF Groundwater contouring indicated that a groundwater mound existed <br /> beneath the site Tliis result suggested that recharge of the groundwater in the vicinity of MW-I and <br /> MW-2 was occurring Three potential sources of recharge were Identified 1) the car wash water <br /> recycling pit system under the building, 2) a leaking or broken sewer line that crosses the area, and 3) <br /> a leaking water supply line An MBAS (Methyl Blue Active Surfactants) analysis was conducted on <br /> groundwater samples collected at the site in July, 1994, to investigate the presence of detergents <br /> MBAS was not detected in the samples <br /> Aquifer testing (24-hour pump test) was conducted at the site by WHF on December 22 and 23, 1994 <br /> MW-1 was used as a pumping well, and MW-4, MW-6, MW-7, and MW-8 were used as observation <br /> wells The results indicated an optimum pumping rate of 5 gpm with an effective radius of 140 feet <br /> Aquifer permeability was estimated at 126 gpd/ftZ <br /> In March, 1996, the PHS/EHD requested that the SVE system and the ICU at the site be evaluated for <br /> effectiveness In May, 1996, Condor was awarded the contract for the SVE evaluation and quarterly <br /> groundwater monitoring (Ref Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Reports, prepared by Condor, 7/96 <br /> through 4/97) <br /> Condor conducted the SVE evaluation in July, 1996 Based on the results of the evaluation, Condor <br /> recommended that operation of the ICU be suspended since the system was not capable of meeting <br /> APCD permit conditions (i e , 95% destruction efficiency) at the time of Condor's investigation <br /> Condor recommended that a 150 SCFM (standard cubic feet per minute) catalytic oxidation system <br /> I (CAT-0X) be installed at the site to extract and treat the gasoline contamination in the vadose zone <br /> (Ref Soil Vapor Extraction System Evaluation, prepared by Condor, dated September 23, 1996) On <br /> February 5 1997, Mr Ronald Rowe of the PHS/EHD approved Condor's recommendations and <br /> requested a work plan for the installation and monitoring of the CAT-OX system <br /> 3 0 PROPOSED CATALYTIC OXIDATION (CAT-OX) SYSTEM <br /> 31 Description <br /> Thi- nrnnnce d CAT-()X system is manufactured by Global Technoloizies of Milwaukee, Wisconsin <br /> (Model I - Vapor Treatment Module) The system will be installed and connected to the existing SVE <br /> wells as shown in Figure 3, Appendix A The system specifications are shown in Appendix B of tills <br /> document The system is designed to be operated 24 hours per day, 7 days per week The CAT-OX <br /> system is expected to be operated continuously for at least one (1) year before minimal hydrocarbon <br /> concciltrations are reached The CAT-OX system will include a skid mounted platform, a water vapor <br /> knockout drum, a dilution air control valve, a system blower (5 HP, 230 VAC, 60 HZ, I PH), a flame <br /> arrestor, a supplemental fuel train a thermal combustion chamber, a catalyst, and an exhaust stack <br /> 1%to— <br /> �� CONDOR <br />