Laserfiche WebLink
QUARTFRLY MONITORING REPORT January, 1998 <br /> CANEPA S CAR WASH <br /> 6230 Paufic Avenue Stockton CA <br /> February 10, 1998 <br /> Page -3 <br />' 3 0 QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING-JANUARY, 1998 <br /> On January 20 and 21, 1998, Condor personnel made field observations and collected groundwater <br /> samples from the eight monitor wells at the site (see Figure 2, Appendix A for well Iocations) In <br /> addition, at the request of Mr Rowe, PI-IS/EHD, a groundwater sample was also collected from soil <br /> vapor extraction well SV-8 The order of sampling was MW-5, MW-4, MW-8, MW-6, MW-3, MW-7, <br /> MW-2, MW-1, and SV-8 <br /> 3 1 GROUNDWATER MONITORING OBSERVATIONS AND PARAMETERS <br /> The static water level in each well was measured to the nearest 0 01-foot with a battery-operated, flat <br /> tape, water-level meter A disposable bailer was lowered into each well to check for floating product, <br /> petroleum odors, and sheen Floating product was not observed in any of the monitor wells during the <br /> groundwater sampling Water levels in the wells were above the top of the well screens in the wells, <br /> however Slight and moderate petroleum hydrocarbon odors were noted in the groundwater samples <br /> collected from MW-2 and SV-8, respectively No odor was noted in any of the other wells at the site <br /> MW-1 was purged using a small submersible pump All other wells were each purged using new, <br /> disposable bailers At least 3 casing volumes of water were purged from each well (see the Groundwater <br /> Monitoring Field Forms in Appendix B ) The purged water from each well was placed in a plastic, 55- <br /> gallon drum and left on site pending analytical results <br /> 3 2 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING <br /> Each well was allowed to recover to at least 80% of its pre-purge water level before sampling The <br /> groundwater samples were collected directly from disposable bailers Each water sample consisted of <br /> three 40-m1 glass, volatile organic analyses (VOA) vials The VOAs were labeled and placed in a cooler <br /> chilled with ice The groundwater samples were delivered, under chain-of-custody procedures, to <br /> GeoAnalytical Laboratories, Inc, in Modesto,California, on the day of collection <br /> 4 0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING RESULTS <br /> 41 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOURS <br />' On January 20, 1998,the depth to groundwater was measured in each monitor well prior to the collection <br /> of groundwater samples The average depth to groundwater was approximately 39 1 feet below the <br /> ground surface (bgs) at the site The average depth to groundwater has decreased approximately 2 2 feet <br /> since October, 1997 The groundwater elevation ranged from 26 68 to 25 67 feet below sea level (bmsl) <br /> The groundwater elevation contour map (Figure 3, Appendix A) indicates groundwater mounding in the <br /> center of the site in the vicinity of MW-1 and MW-2 See Table 1, below, for groundwater elevation <br /> data A lrydrograph of groundwater elevations is included as Figure 4, Appendix A <br /> �� CONDOR <br />