Laserfiche WebLink
,Sent, BY; PWQCB SACRAMENTO; 916 255 3015; Feb-24-99 14.10, Page 6/6 <br /> 1665 Pacific Avenue -5- 16 February 1499 <br /> Petition Summary and Conclusions Regional Board Response <br /> (PAgcs 12- 14 <br /> 10). Detectable concentrations of TPHg in shallow I agree that TPHg contamination in groundwater <br /> groundwater in contact with the limited residual below the site and offsite does and will violate the <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons adsorbed to soil particles Basin Plan objectives. I also agree that <br /> will likely remain above 5 ppb(the commonly contaminant levels will continue to violate these <br /> accepted odor threshold for drinking water)and objective for a substantial time period. However, <br /> thus violate the Basin Plan's narrative odor as with the above response to No. 9,the <br /> objective in a very localized,small volume of contaminated subsurface volume is not small and <br /> surrounding groundwater for anywhere from concentrations are not near detection limits. <br /> decades to hundreds of years. Contamination is confirmed vertically to at least 54 <br /> feet below ground surface and laterally at least 150 <br /> feet offsite. TPHg concentrations of 83,000µglL <br /> were reported for the 8131198 sampling event. <br /> 11). The determination as to what constitutes a The determination of a reasonable time period to <br /> reasonable period to attain water quality objectives attain water quality objectives must consider the <br /> must be based on evaluation of all relevant factors, residual contaminant mass and contaminated <br /> including but not limited to the extent and gravity subsurface volume. An estimated contaminant <br /> of any threat to public health and the environment mals has not been provided and the contaminated <br /> during the period required to meet Basin Plan subsurface volume is laterally and vertically <br /> objectives. Although the time required to attain extensive(laterally,approximately 150 feet offsite, <br /> objectives in this case is lengthy, it is a reasonable and vertically to at least 54 feet bgs). Recent <br /> period considering the facts of this particular case, vertical characterization activities have not been <br /> including that there are no drinking water wells submitted for regulatory review and must be <br /> within goo feet of the site and that affected water is evaluated to determine the contaminated <br /> of inferior quality and will likely be excluded from subsurface volume and residual contaminant mass. <br /> any well which may be constructed in the future. It <br /> is highly unlikely that petroleum constituents The nearest municipal drinking water well is <br /> detected in the immediate area of the discharge located 800 feet north-northeast of the site <br /> will migrate substantially beyond the current (approximately downgradient),and three others are <br /> limited spatial extent.and it is highly unlikely that within 3000 feet. The well completion details for <br /> this particular very limited pocket of shallow the four nearby production wells do not preclude <br /> groundwater will be used directly as a source of vertical contaminant migration as sanitary seals do <br /> drinking water in the foreseeable future. not extend below 70 to 96 feet bgs. These <br /> production wells.are capable of sustaining <br /> pumping rates between 450 and 900 gallons per <br /> minute. Also,nothing prevents Cal-Water or any <br /> other water purveyor from placing a new well near <br /> the contaminated site. <br />