Laserfiche WebLink
Ozone Microsparge System Pilot Test Status Report,Former Unocal Service Station#2859,Stockton,CA <br /> June 6,2003 <br /> In 1988, two 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs and one 550-gallon waste oil UST were removed Soy] <br /> samples collected from the base of the gasoline UST excavation contained TPHg and benzene at <br /> maximum concentrations of 13 and 0 29 ppm, respectively <br /> Between June 1988 and February 1992, seven monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-7), three vapor <br /> extraction wells (VW-1 through VW-3), and one soil boring were installed by Applied Geosystems and <br /> RESNA The highest TPHg and benzene concentrations reported were from an area around the northern <br /> product island location,at concentrations up to 17,300 and 28 ppm,respectively <br /> A soil vapor extraction test was conducted by RESNA in 1992 The test showed that a wellhead flow rate <br /> of 43 cubic feet per minute and an estimated radius of influence of approximately 25 feet could be <br /> achieved <br /> In July 1994, Pacific Environmental Group, Inc (PEG) installed monitoring wells MW-8 and MW-9 <br /> Groundwater samples from the wells were non-detect for benzene,but TPHg were detected in wells MW- <br /> 8 and MW-9 at concentrations of 93 and 110 parts per billion(ppb),respectively <br /> PEG performed a six-month on-site vapor extraction pilot study in 1996 During that study, <br /> approximately 2,745 pounds (450 gallons) of TPHg and 12 pounds (1 6 gallons) of benzene were <br /> removed <br /> ARCADIS Geraghty& Miller, Inc installed wells MW-10 and NP-1 in January 1999 Soil samples from <br /> well NP-1 showed impact beneath the site between 40 and 60 feet below ground surface (bgs) The <br /> highest TPHg and benzene concentrations were from a sample at 60 feet bgs at 290 and 5 8 ppm, <br /> respectively Discrete grab groundwater samp]es from well boring NP-1 had concentrations of TPHg and <br /> benzene in samples collected between 50 and 70 feet bgs The highest concentrations of TPHg and <br /> benzene detected were 200,000 (50 feet bgs) and 21,000(60 feet bgs)ppb, respectively <br /> In May 2001, GR installed nine groundwater monitoring wells (MW-11 through MW-19) on and <br /> downgradient of the site TPHg, benzene, or methyl tert-butyl ether (MtBE) were not detected in soil <br /> samples from the well borings MtBE was not detected in groundwater samples from the wells TPHg <br /> and benzene were reported in groundwater samples from wells installed on and immediately <br /> downgradient of the site at concentrations up to 31,000 and 720 ppb,respectively <br /> GR performed a five-day vapor extraction(VE)test at the site from June 18 through 22, 2001 The purpose <br /> of the VE test was to evaluate the feasibility of the VE technology and collect needed site specific data for <br /> the design of a VE system if necessary A 39 hour VE test was performed using an IC engine and extracted <br /> soil vapors from wells VW-1, VW-2, and VW-3 Based on the VE monitoring data, no significant amount <br /> of TPHg or benzene were removed during the pilot test GR estimated that less than one pound per day of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons would be extracted and was not a viable remedial technology <br /> In March 2002, GR installed two off-site groundwater monitoring wells(MW-20 and MW-21) and eight <br /> on site ozone sparge points (SP-lA, SP-113, SP-1C, SP-2A, SP-213, SP-2C, SP-3A and SP-313) TPHg, <br /> benzene, or methyl tert-butyl ether (MtBE) were not detected in soil samples from the monitoring well <br /> bonngs <br /> • <br /> 240072 06 2 <br />