Laserfiche WebLink
ENSR <br />' the pilot test indicated that VE would have little or no effect at the site due to a limited <br /> area of vacuum influence and a low rate of hydrocarbon recovery Extraction rates <br /> for VW-3 were between 0 01 to 0 8 pounds of TPHg per day with extraction rates for <br /> VW-1 and VW-2 between 0 01 and 0 7 pounds of TPHg per day GRI concluded the <br /> expected radius of influence would be less than 45 feet and decrease with time <br /> Therefore, VE would have little or no effect at this site <br /> March 2002 Monitoring wells MW-20 and MW-21 were installed and soil samples were collected <br /> at 5-foot intervals from each location All of the 7 soil samples analyzed for TPHg, <br /> benzene, and MTBE were non-detect <br /> Ozone sparge couplets SP-1 A/B/C, SP-2A/B/C, and SP-3A/B were installed between <br /> March 4---8, 2002 to depths of 30 (A-senes wells) and 60 feet bgs (B-series wells), <br /> and 90 feet bgs (C-series wells) <br /> April 2002 Monitoring wells MW-20 and MW-21 were sampled on April 11, 2002 TPHg, <br /> benzene, and MTBE were not detected in these wells <br /> August 2002 A C-SpargeTM ozone microsparging system began operation on August 14, 2002 <br /> Monitoring wells MW-2, MW-10, MW-11, and NP-1 have been monitored monthly to <br /> evaluate the effectiveness of the C-SpargeTM system <br /> February 2003 Groundwater sampling conducted on February 27 and 28, 2003 indicate that the <br /> groundwater flow for zone A continues to be in the northeasterly direction, however, <br /> the flow for zone B is in the southeasterly direction <br /> March 2003 Summary of monthly data collected at wells MW-2, MW-10, MW-11, and NP-1 from <br /> August 2002 through March 2003 indicate a final decrease in TPHg and benzene in <br /> all the wells monitored with the exception of an increase in benzene in well MW-11 <br /> April 2005 The San Joaquin Environmental Health Department(SJEHD) issued a letter to <br /> UNOCAL regarding the source of 1,2-dichloroethane detected in the groundwater <br /> (see Appendix B) The SJEHD did not find any records that other sites in the area <br /> were the source of the 1,2-DCA so they concluded that the source is from the <br /> UNOCAL site <br /> Groundwater monitoring and ozone microsparge system reports have been issued quarterly, documenting <br /> the on-going remedial and assessment activities performed on site Additional Enrormation describing the <br /> findings of site investigation activities and the progress of remedial actions is presented in Section 3 0 <br /> 2-4 bird 5 {6 <br />