ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012364 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

January 1 g96 Gn January 17, 199 ENSR j Febru on the sort vapor e 6' a source test Was ary i99G The xtractron syste Performed r SVE system iv m {SVE) by l'acrfrc Environmental approval from theas Put into o Group lVovernber San Jo Aeration an F 1996 �orrnance of the SVE Ilot, Valley Unified Air 12, 1996 after r Aar Pollution Co ecerpt of not be be however, the plot test indicated that Control District nefrclal based mass remove!trend at 2, X96 tuber Summ o ass remov d indica ed that Pounds of TPH9 was n rn Summary of 6 months SV a!versus hours continued operation gallons) of TPHg and 12 E pilot test indicated that a of operation Would January 1989 pilot study Pounds {7 6 ns ben e naxr 5 ar galla ) of p mately 2,74 Well Np-1 Was installed ne Was removed pounds (460 nd'groundwater ort January during the NPuspro S et at 85 to�samAling with a Simul 1999 with`✓olitrrn, logging a depth of 64 fee be well be? rhe frnalascree0 foot rrrteriral)sari Sort 9 was riot PerfOrnred ontMW Greened interval - 0) as installed S interval for NP_i analytical 7Q due to it's 50 to 60 feet le Gevly from and 60-foot Sem to collected from proxy MTBE W p!e and n m lvR1 re rnrty to NP-1 Geologic as not detecte dn'detect results 70 and ST EX BTEX increased d at any o f the Salts in the 7 EX in the 40-, So_ the 40-foot sarn aSed s'vrth depth from i amPle de . �Q-0 a , foot Sample Pis to 290 mg�l<g of Tp}l Mg/kg tP!!9 and�raat goat sarr7pH s g and82,579 4 °f TP g and Que to mfg of total Mg/kg total E37-EX in collected only of water for the Ex total the 60- Were highest at the Srmulprabe decreased in the 50 , 50- and 70-foot depths grourr M94) ased Signifrce s oot Sample(TP epths co' gro" dwater samples rare February iggg Quarterly Yin the 70-foot setup!{TPH�`��total Bof TExTP 5g and BTEX Y manrtonn mgll and total grX l)and Februar g of 1 t wells 14 7 {NPN,q Y`�, 199g In (MVV_ and other water 1 ^MW-fp and aside from the ter quality Parameters and STEX, +rrtonrtoa. re) was Conducted on vicinit Petroleum meters w d n nducte yin the site is poor and doYdrocarbQn impacts, thealYzed It should be etural tnoted that quality results rrrdreate that es not general d that wells meet the c Water note Salt water rntruslo at groundwater, A drinking quality In the May 2001 n is belt e We111yp. g water standar Monitoring wells MVV_ sued to i rs clearly different than Water 11 thr be occurr,n9 at well NP-1 samples were ough M nearby Sort sarnpfes analyzed f from T., gged boring from June�GOi or 7"P g locations MaY 2i _23 Groundwater ser 91 benze at 5 foot in , 20C�1 Sorl high levels A y of all ne and Mrg were reals All of t hr els of rPH lin wefts was E nen-detect he 20 the wells Based Q 9 and benzene in conducted on J were defined new rnonrorrrr many wells MT$Eune 5—6, 2001 Indicating flowed to The shallower , g Felts instal! Was not detected in bgs flowed o thnheast and the de�A (to an aPproxrtwo different groundam� any of e southeast per zone B, Ater zar7 aril zone 8 neee�ed ,(to gate depth of 60 feet bgs es June 2007 to be furl e, A needed o be fu approximofe depth ) '� 5 day vaAQr extras G'elineated to the so rther delineated tof 90 feet from three VF tion (VE) test W utheaSt the north wells V1rV-i VW-2 W as preforrned per minute {scat the frn)at applied vadum doVVV-J at rates bet site from June 18 f i to 6 Inch Ween 8 to 14 standard22, et Inches of Watetcolurnn Resut of t 2-3