Laserfiche WebLink
' ENSR � i <br />' agricultural and other purposes) in which the groundwater in the area had risen <br /> approximately 30 feet in some areas <br /> January 1988 Preliminary Phase I investigation conducted Five soil borings were installed to a <br /> depth of approximately 20 to 25 feet below ground surface (bgs) and 10 sod samples <br /> were analyzed for TPH and BTEX Highest levels of hydrocarbons were detected on <br /> either side of the pump island Groundwater encountered at approximately 25 to 30 <br /> feet bgs <br /> February 1988 Service station was demolished and the site was graded and remains vacant <br /> March 1988 The two 10,000-gallon gasoline and one 550-gallon USTs were removed Post- <br /> excavation samples indicated hydrocarbons still remained in the gasoline tank pit <br />' area Additional excavation was performed which had expanded the tank cavity to 25 <br /> x 35 feet and to an approximate depth of 30 feet Groundwater had entered the tank <br /> cavity several hours after the excavation was competed A total of 1,100 cubic yards <br /> of soil were removed during excavation ARCADIS report indicates a SJCPHS letter <br /> states that 1,350 cubic yards were removed, but later correspondence questions the <br /> exact amount of sod excavated <br /> June 1988 Three borings were drilled and monitoring wells installed (MW-1 through MW-3) Sod <br /> samples indicated that extent of contamination in soil is delineated to the north of the <br /> tank cavity, to the west and east of the former pump island The quarterly <br /> groundwater sampling program began at this time <br /> August 1989 Three additional soil borings were drilled with two monitoring wells installed at the <br /> two offsite boring locations (MW-4 and MW-5) Sod analytical results indicate that soil <br /> has been delineated at the southern end of the property based on TPHg and BTEX <br /> results being below detection limits TPHg was detected in both MW-4 and MW-5 as <br /> well as low levels of ethylbenzene in MW-5 and total xylenes in both wells <br /> August 1990 Summary of eight quarterly groundwater sampling events (June 1988 through <br /> August 1990) show that MW-2 has the highest TPHg and BTEX concentrations and <br /> have increased in concentration each monitoring event Wells MW-1 and MW-3 to <br /> MW-5 have BTEX below detection limits or low levels TPHg concentrations are <br /> detected in MW-3 ranging from 120 to 1,000 ppb TPHg concentrations are also <br /> detected in MW-4 and MW-5, ranging from 86 to 150 and 30 to 180 ppb, <br /> respectively Soils were delineated, with residual hydrocarbons remaining northwest <br />' and southeast of the pump island <br /> March 1992 Vapor extraction (VE) pilot test performed to collect site-specific data and evaluate <br /> VE as a remedial alternative Results of test indicate that, with a wellhead flow rate of <br />' 43 cubic feet per minute (cfm), an estimated radius of influence of approximately 25 <br /> feet could be achieved for one vapor extraction well <br /> August 1993 Recommendation to install 2 additional monitoring wells (one south to complete <br /> lateral definition [MW-9] and one southwest in an upgradient location [MW-8]) and <br /> add to the existing quarterly groundwater sampling program <br /> July 1994 Wells MW-8 and MW-9 were installed on July 14, 1994 MW-8 was installed west <br /> and upgradient of the site and MW-9 was installed southeast of the site in the street <br /> on Pacific Avenue PID readings were zero and soil samples (collected every 10 <br /> feet) were all non-detect for TPHg and BTEX Wells were developed and sampled on <br /> August 1, 1994 for TPHg and BTEX BTEX in both wells was non-detect TPHg was <br /> 93 ppb for MW-8 and 110 ppb for MW-9 <br /> 2-2 <br />