Laserfiche WebLink
E22 June 1998 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 95-0173 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> 2 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLING <br /> The ground water levels in the monitoring wells achieved a minimum of 80 percent recharge prior <br /> to sample collection Ground water samples were collected utilizing disposable polyethylene bailers <br /> and new nylon rope Sufficient ground water sample was collected from each well to fill three 40-m1 <br /> EPA-approved VOA vials containing 0 5 ml 18%hydrochloric acid as a presen ative for the samples <br /> and one liter amber bottle Care was taken to ensure that visible air bubbles were not present in the <br /> VOA vials after filling and capping Ground water sample containers were labeled with the well <br /> designation, date, time, and sampler's Initials <br /> 23 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Each ground water sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form, placed In a chilled container and <br /> transported to a California state-certified laboratory for analysis in accordance with the following <br /> EPA method 8015M for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel <br /> (TPH-g and TPH-d, respectively) <br /> EPA method 8020 for volatile aromatics (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene <br /> BTE&X) with methyl-tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) <br /> • EPA method 8260 for volatile organic compounds (including oxygenates) <br /> tThe laboratory reports (Castle Analytical Laboratory Lab No 1532, McCampbell Analytical Inc <br /> Lab I D 88097 to 88100) and chain-of-custody forms are presented in Appendix B <br /> 3 0. FINDINGS <br /> 3 1 RELATIVE GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> Measured depths to ground water in the monitoring wells ranged from 26 03 feet to 28 33 feet below <br /> the tops of the well casings Between October 1997 and April 1998, ground water elevation <br /> increased an average 6 10 feet at the site <br /> Duringthe April 1998 round water monitoring event, the gradient was calculated to be 0 0035 Rift, <br /> p g g <br /> or approximately 19 feet per mile (Figure 3) Ground water monitoring data collected in the area of <br /> the monitoring wells suggests that the ground water flow direction was generally toward the east- <br /> southeast The ground water elevation data for the monitoring wells during the April 1998 ground <br /> Advanced GeoEnrironmenial,Inc <br />