My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005429
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
2402
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545640
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005429
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 2:16:56 PM
Creation date
5/5/2020 1:32:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005429
RECORD_ID
PR0545640
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003900
FACILITY_NAME
PACIFIC PRIDE COMMERCIAL FUEL
STREET_NUMBER
2402
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12506001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2402 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E22 June 1998 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 95-0173 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> 2 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLING <br /> The ground water levels in the monitoring wells achieved a minimum of 80 percent recharge prior <br /> to sample collection Ground water samples were collected utilizing disposable polyethylene bailers <br /> and new nylon rope Sufficient ground water sample was collected from each well to fill three 40-m1 <br /> EPA-approved VOA vials containing 0 5 ml 18%hydrochloric acid as a presen ative for the samples <br /> and one liter amber bottle Care was taken to ensure that visible air bubbles were not present in the <br /> VOA vials after filling and capping Ground water sample containers were labeled with the well <br /> designation, date, time, and sampler's Initials <br /> 23 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Each ground water sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form, placed In a chilled container and <br /> transported to a California state-certified laboratory for analysis in accordance with the following <br /> EPA method 8015M for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel <br /> (TPH-g and TPH-d, respectively) <br /> EPA method 8020 for volatile aromatics (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene <br /> BTE&X) with methyl-tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) <br /> • EPA method 8260 for volatile organic compounds (including oxygenates) <br /> tThe laboratory reports (Castle Analytical Laboratory Lab No 1532, McCampbell Analytical Inc <br /> Lab I D 88097 to 88100) and chain-of-custody forms are presented in Appendix B <br /> 3 0. FINDINGS <br /> 3 1 RELATIVE GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> Measured depths to ground water in the monitoring wells ranged from 26 03 feet to 28 33 feet below <br /> the tops of the well casings Between October 1997 and April 1998, ground water elevation <br /> increased an average 6 10 feet at the site <br /> Duringthe April 1998 round water monitoring event, the gradient was calculated to be 0 0035 Rift, <br /> p g g <br /> or approximately 19 feet per mile (Figure 3) Ground water monitoring data collected in the area of <br /> the monitoring wells suggests that the ground water flow direction was generally toward the east- <br /> southeast The ground water elevation data for the monitoring wells during the April 1998 ground <br /> Advanced GeoEnrironmenial,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.