Laserfiche WebLink
' 08 April 2005 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0173 <br />' Page 8 of 10 <br />' screened Intervals of all other wells at the site and should be representative of shallow ground <br /> water conditions <br /> • Ground water elevation data collected on 30 November 2004 implies that ground water <br /> fmounding did not occur at the site due to the on-going IAS activities <br /> • The elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons detected in samples collected from <br />' wells MW-2 (screened 30 feet to 50 feet) and MW-4 (screened 30 feet to 50 feet) indicate <br /> that these wells are within the remaining dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon"core area"of the <br /> plume (Figure 4) <br />' The rapid decrease in dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations at AW-1 (A and B) <br /> and AW-2 (A and B)can be attributed to the ongoing air sparging activities at well AW-1 B <br /> during July through December 2004 However, previous analytical ground water data has <br /> indicated this concentration reduction may later rebound <br /> • The rapid,upward movement of volatilized hydrocarbons at AW-IB was substantiated with <br />' the observed `spikes' in the August, September, October and November influent air flow <br /> samples <br />� . Generally, an overall apparent trend of decreasing dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations is evident in water samples collected from wells MW-3, MW-4, MW-6, <br /> AW-1 (A and B), and AW-2 (A and B), the trend of decreasing concentrations may be <br /> attributed to the air sparge activities being performed at well AW-1B (Table 3) <br /> • A moderate increase in dissolved hydrocarbons was observed in well MW-1,the increase in <br /> I hydrocarbon concentrations may be attributed to a`rebound' effect from the second quarter <br /> 2004 IAS activities previously conducted from well AW-2B <br /> • A significant decrease in dissolved hydrocarbons was observed at well MW-2,the significant <br /> decrease may be representative of a eastward shift of the ground water plume probably <br /> caused by 3`a quarter 2004 reconfiguration of air spargmg from well AW-2B (60-70 feet)to <br /> AW-1B (50-60 feet) <br /> • Previous and current laboratory results of ground water samples suggest that there is a minor <br /> 1,2-DCA impact to ground water in the areas of wells MW-2 through MW-4 and AW-2 <br /> (A and B, Tables 3 and 4) <br /> Based on SVE remediation data collected between 23 September and 22 December 2004, AGE <br /> concludes <br /> • The average SVE inlet vapor concentration was approximately 820 µg11, the average SVE <br /> Inlet flow rate was approximately 74 cubic feet per minute (Table 6) <br />' Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />