Laserfiche WebLink
KEI-P89--1104 .QR4 <br /> February 3 , 1992 <br /> Page 5 <br /> The total depth of the well was measured at 135 feet below grade, <br /> and the static water level was measured at 55 feet below grade. <br /> The length of the existing casing could not be determined with the <br /> equipment on-site. Approximately 135 gallons of water were bailed <br /> from the water well by the use of a clean stainless steel bailer. <br /> A water sample was obtained for analyses, and it was noted that the <br /> water sample contained sediment and what appeared to be iron <br /> flakes. The water sample was analyzed at Sequoia Analytical <br /> Laboratory in Redwood City, California, on April 24 , 1990, for TPH <br /> as gasoline and BTX&E. The analytical results indicated non- <br /> detectable levels of TPH as gasoline and BTX&E, except for 0. 79 ppb <br /> of toluene. Mr. Knoll was informed of the results on May 10, 1990, <br /> and indicated that the ground water should be treated as contami- <br /> nated because of the detected toluene. <br /> West Hazmat only had 100 feet of the 12-inch O.D. augers available <br /> on-site on April 23 , 1990, and therefore the well (135 feet deep) <br /> could not be fully drilled out and the casing could not be removed <br /> from the ground. A phone call was placed from the field to Mrs. <br /> Diane Henson of the SJCPHS to determine if the work plan could be <br /> modified to allow the six-inch diameter well casing to remain in <br /> the ground and to allow grout being placed only on the inside of <br /> the casing for the full depth of the well. This modification to <br /> our work plan was verbally approved by Mrs. Henson. <br /> However, further evaluation of the surface area ad3acent to the <br /> six-inch diameter well casing identified a second casing (approxi- <br /> mately 10 inches in diameter) around the six-inch diameter casing. <br /> The depth of the second casing could not be determined, and it was <br /> unclear if the annulus between the six and ten-inch diameter <br /> casings was backfilled or open. A second phone call was placed to <br /> Diane Henson on April 23 , 1990, and it was determined that only <br /> grouting of the inside of the six-inch casing would not necessarily <br /> provide an adequate seal to protect the ground water. Therefore, <br /> KEI was instructed not to destroy the water well at that time. <br /> The water well was provided with a temporary surface seal on April <br /> 23 , 1990, by driving in a circular wood plug, pouring one sack of <br /> bentonite powder gel over the wood plug and vicinity, and placing <br /> cement over the bentonite gel. <br /> KEI contacted Purviance Drillers, Inc. of Linden, California, for <br /> a proposal to properly abandon the dual-cased water well. It was <br /> initially proposed to het out any materials within the annulus <br /> spacing between the two well casings, split the six-inch diameter <br /> casing with a down-the-hole perforator tool, and to place Baroid <br /> Aquagrout Benseal within the annulus and within the six-inch <br /> diameter casing for the full depth of the well, by the use of a <br /> tremie tube. In addition, it was subsequently proposed to conduct <br />