Laserfiche WebLink
. KEI-P89-1104 .R7 <br /> December 10, 1990 <br /> Page 4 <br /> final soil samples collected from product pipe trenches, {samples <br /> P1 (6) , P2 (17) , P3 (5) and P4 (8) 1 , indicated levels of TPH as <br /> gasoline ranging from non-detectable to 1.7 ppm, with non-detect- <br /> able levels of benzene, except sample P2 (17) , which showed 7, 200 <br /> ppm of TPH as gasoline and 170 ppm of benzene. Analyses of vapor <br /> piping trench samples indicated non-detectable levels of TPH as <br /> gasoline for sample V1, and 4 .2 ppm TPH as gasoline for sample V2 , <br /> with non-detectable levels of EDB in each case. <br /> The waste oil tank bottom and remote fill piping samples showed <br /> non-detectable levels of TEPH and all EPA method 8010, 8020 and <br /> 8080 constituents. <br /> Analyses of the water sample from the on-site domestic well <br /> indicated 160 ppb of TPH as gasoline, with non-detectable con- <br /> centrations of all other analytes. <br /> The analytical results for the old and new fuel tank pit, product <br /> pipe trench and vapor pipe trench soil samples are summarized in <br /> Table 4 . The analytical results for waste oil tank bottom and <br /> . remote fill piping soil samples are summarized xn Table 5. <br /> Analytical results for the water sample are summarized in Table 6. <br /> To comply with the requirements of the regulatory agencies and <br /> based on the analytical results, KEI proposed installation of four <br /> monitoring wells. Results of the soil samples from the tank <br /> excavation are summarized in KEI 's report (KEI-P-89-1104 .R1) dated <br /> January 8, 1990. <br /> Mr. Harlin Knoll of the SJCPHS, per telephone conversations on <br /> February 7 and March 8 , 1990, required that the water well be <br /> properly destroyed due to the levels of TPH as gasoline indicated <br /> in the laboratory analyses results and that one additional water <br /> sample be collected after all piping and the pump are removed from <br /> the well, and the well purged of at least three to four well <br /> volumes. <br /> A site inspection conducted on March 15, 1990 by Mr. Don Braun of <br /> KEI, and Mr. Harlin Knoll of the SJCPHS indicates that the vicinity <br /> of the existing well had been paved with asphaltic concrete and <br /> that an old concrete Christy box was placed around the well and <br /> remaining piping. The well seal appeared in tact. The well casing <br /> was locally exposed and appeared to be steel and about six-inches <br /> in diameter. <br /> The service station was connected to the municipal water system and <br /> disconnected from the on-site water well prior to April, 1990. <br />