My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009569
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
7303
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545644
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009569
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2020 10:10:55 AM
Creation date
5/6/2020 9:57:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009569
RECORD_ID
PR0545644
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003814
FACILITY_NAME
TOSCO CORPORATION #30878*
STREET_NUMBER
7303
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
07736021
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
7303 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KEI-P89-1104 .R7 <br /> December 10, 1990 <br /> Page 5 <br /> Details of the existing water well at the site were researched at <br /> the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) in Sacramento. <br /> Mrs. Betty Swatsenbarg of the DWR reviewed the State records on <br /> March 14, 1990 and reported that no records were available for this <br /> well at the DWR. Based on Mars. Swatsenbarg's extensive experience <br /> at the DWR, the sub]ect water well was probably drilled and <br /> installed prior to 1951. At that time, steel casings were driven <br /> into the subsurface and the remainder of the wells were generally <br /> open below the casing. <br /> On April 23 , 1990, an attempt was made to destroy the existing six- <br /> inch diameter water well by West Hazmat of Rancho Cordova, <br /> California. The proposed plan involved drilling out the well <br /> casing, using 12-inch O.D. (6-1/4-inch I.D. ) hollow-stem augers, to <br /> the total depth of the casing; pulling out the old casing; <br /> redrilling the well to the full depth, and pressure grouting the <br /> well using a tremie pipe and a neat cement grout. <br /> During field activities on April 23, 1990, the old pump (5 feet <br /> long) and pump casing (60 feet long) were removed from the well. <br /> The total depth of the well was measured at 135 feet with the <br /> static water level measured at 55 feet. The length of the existing <br /> casing could not be determined with the equipment on-site. <br /> Approximately 135 gallons of water were bailed from the water well <br /> using a clean stainless steel bailer. A water sample was obtained <br /> for analyses, and it was noted that the water sample contained <br /> sediment and what appeared to be iron flakes. The water sample was <br /> analyzed at Sequoia Analytical Laboratory in Redwood City, Califor- <br /> nia, on April 24 , 1990 for TPH as gasoline and BTX&E. The <br /> analytical results indicated non-detectable levels of TPH as <br /> gasoline and BTX&E, except for 0.79 ppb of toluene. Mr. Harlin <br /> Knoll of the SJCPHS was informed on May 10, 1990, and indicated <br /> that the ground water should be treated as contaminated because of <br /> the detected toluene. <br /> West Hazmat only had 100 feet of the 12-inch O.D. augers available <br /> on-sate on April 23 , 1990, and therefore the well (135 feet deep) <br /> could not be fully drilled out and the casing removed from the <br /> ground. A phone call was placed from the field to Mrs. Diane <br /> Henson of the SJCPHS to determine if the work plan could be <br /> modified to allow the six-inch diameter well casing to remain in <br /> the ground and grout placed only on the inside of the casing for <br /> the full depth of the well. This modification to our work plan was <br /> verbally approved by Mrs. Diane Henson. <br /> However, further evaluation of the surface area adjacent to the <br /> six-inch diameter well casing identified a second casing, approxi- <br /> mately 10 inches in diameter, around the six-inch diameter casing. <br /> The depth of the second casing could not be determined, and it was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.