SU0013248 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1. Projects Coordinator -2- July 17 , 1990 2 . Mr. Richard Larrouy across it. This alternative also avoids the loss of riparian wetland hab" tat associated with bridge relocation. It is the olicy of the DFG to oppose projects which would result in a net oss of either wetland acreage or wetland habitat value. The applicant should be advised that work consisting of but not limited to diversion or obstruction of the natural flow or changes in the channel, bed, or bank of any river, stream, or lake, will require notification to the DFG as required by Fish and Game code Section 1600, at seq. The notification (with fee) , and subsequent 3 agreement must be completed prior to initiating any such work. Notification to the DFG should be made after the project is approved by the lead aggency. The agreement process should not be used in lieu of specific mitigation measures to be included as conditions of project approval by the lead ag ncy. Pursuant to Public Resources Code sections 21092 and 21092 . 2 the DFG requests written notification of proposed actions and pending decisions regarding this project. Written notification should be directed to this office. In conclusion, the DFG reoommands that the "no river crossing" alternative be adopted in order. to lessen impacts to wetlands as a result of this excavation project. we would not oppose certification of the Draft EIR if the above-mentioned recommendations are incorporated into the document and made conditions of the permit approved. If the DFG can be of further assistance, please contact Mr. Bob Maes, Associate Wildlife Biologist, or Ms . Patricia Perkins, Wildlife Management Supervisor, Region 2 , Department of Fish and Game, 1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 , telephone (916) 355-7010. (� P to Sontadelli rector