Laserfiche WebLink
IfL <br /> I <br /> � area, to ascertain whether any supply wells are located near the site. According <br /> to Mr. Eric Marr, operations manager in the Stockton field office, drinking <br /> water for the entire Port of Stockton complex, as well as all residential areas <br /> E� east and southeast of the complex, is supplied via pipeline from the Stockton <br /> municipal supply system. Mr. Marr stated that there are no operational <br /> municipal supply wells within one-half mile of the Port of Stockton due to the <br /> "poor quality" of delta water. <br /> The Port maintains a single, private water well which was installed in December <br /> 1990 located immediately north of the Port administration building (about 1,700 <br /> . feet southwest of Site 1) which is used solely for lawn irrigation. The driller's <br /> log for this well indicates the well is perforated from 105 to 145 feet bgs, and <br /> has a sanitary seal from 0 to 50 feet. According to Port maintenance personnel, <br /> the only other wells located within the Port complex are located along Navy <br /> Drive on the western margin of the Port, more than 4,500 feet southwest of Site <br /> 1. These wells have been abandoned and do not supply water to the surface. <br /> o The Port of Stockton has been an industrial site for more than 60 years. The J <br /> reasonably anticipated future use of the site is also industrial. As.such, the ; <br /> likelihood of any new water wells being drilled in the vicinity of Site 1 for.the <br /> 4 purpose of supplying drinking water to humans is minimal. <br /> O The risk of inhalation of MTBE or dermal contact is minimal since the MTBE <br /> is confined to the subsurface and much of the site is currently paved. <br /> o The risk to aquatic organisms in the deep water channel appears minimal for the <br /> }j following reasons: (a) MTBE was not detected in groundwater collected in <br /> borings B1-1 or B1-3. Both these borings were located north of B1'-2 (where <br /> MTBE was detected), suggesting that groundwater is not flowing northward <br /> `A toward the channel, (b) northerly groundwater flow .is unlikely in this area in <br /> general, as the presence of the deep water channel likely serves to maintain, <br /> southerly hydraulic gradients, and (c) even if MTBE introduced to.groundwater <br /> �i near the site did migrate northward, the concentrations would' be greatly <br /> attenuated by dilution during groundwater transport and contact with channel <br /> water. <br /> in summary, current and reasonably anticipated future site use indicates that beneficial use of <br /> groundwater near Site 1 is not currently impaired, and should not be expected to become <br /> impaired, by MTBE in groundwater at or near this site. Overall, the risk to human health and <br /> safety and to the environment appear minimal. <br /> 7 981I7uKVRP SMuST1NV.R.Pr <br /> t � BOYAJIAN & ROSS, INC. <br /> Environmental Scientists& Engineers <br />