Laserfiche WebLink
I cc: Dennis A _ark/WRD/USGS/DOI@USGS <br /> I <br /> Subject: Phone call from Mike Infurna- San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Inspector I <br /> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> ----------------------------------------I <br /> John, <br /> I just spoke with Mike Infurna (San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Inspector- office 209-468-3454) . He had several questions regarding the <br /> permit to install the Odex well at the Morada lane site. <br /> First-There was a clarification of the diameter of the HDP wires and <br /> LYS tubes- Apparently the permit listed something like 2 1/8" tubes and he <br /> read it as being a single tube 2 1/8" in diameter instead of a count of two <br /> each being 1/8"- This brought up the 2" annular seal question- by <br /> clarifying the diameters and count I believe the question was answered and <br /> situation was taken care of. <br /> Second- The address- A gave him 3024 Morada lane- based on the <br /> address he said the property is owned by the County Flood Control (maybe he <br /> said City Flood Control) either way I believe this is the correct property <br /> as it was on the last permit and plotted up in the proper location <br /> according to the location I described and the map he was viewing. <br /> Third- He seemed concerned that the dry mixture of large grout chips, <br /> fine grout chips and #60 (?) sand would not form a proper seal. I explained <br /> we tremmied it down to depth (the odex casing is one large diameter tremmie <br /> pipe) and the mixture was designed to provide an adequate seal. The large <br /> chips provided volume, the fine chips filled the space and the sand <br /> provided structure. He accepted the explanation but still expressed <br /> concerns that this might not work and the mixture might not hydrate. I <br /> stated that we had other wells that were constructed in this manner and <br /> they appeared to be sealing fine. He seamed to OK with this but was still <br /> skeptical. <br /> Fourth- He was concerned about a perched water table. I told him I <br /> did not recall seeing one on the first hole but was not sure. <br /> Fifth- He is trying to finalize the permit but did not think we would <br /> be able to drill the end of next week. He is booked on the 13, 14, and 15. <br /> He suggested delaying things until the 18. This causes a problem with Santa <br /> Clara- I spent all day notifying everyone we would start on the 18. <br /> Sixth- We need to resend the MFR (Master File Record) with a <br /> completed 3rd Party Billing Section (near the bottom?) It states who they <br /> will send the bill to if the inspections cost more then the prepaid amount. <br /> He did speak with Tony Tovar and Tony told him that would be us. <br /> If there are any questions we should call him. <br /> Rhett <br /> 2 <br />