My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2010_2011 ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SIXTH
>
720
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009049
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2010_2011 ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2020 4:14:49 PM
Creation date
5/13/2020 1:33:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2010_2011 ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0009049
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004041
FACILITY_NAME
UP TRACY RAIL YARD
STREET_NUMBER
720
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
SIXTH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25001014
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
720 E SIXTH ST
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
844
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARCADIS 2010/2011 Annual <br /> ' Monitoring Report <br /> Union Pacific Railroad <br /> ' Company <br /> Tracy, CA- Maintenance <br /> Blaine Tech field notes are provided in Appendix A. Laboratory data reports and the Facility <br /> ' data review memoranda are included in Appendix B. <br /> 4.0 Laboratory Data Review <br /> Analytical data were reviewed by Conestoga-Rovers&Associates(CRA)by the <br /> criteria established by the methods and with the following guidance documents: <br /> • USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Organic <br /> Data Review(USEPA 1999) <br /> • USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic <br /> Data Review(USEPA 1994) <br /> According to CRA, overall the data were found to exhibit acceptable levels of accuracy <br /> and precision, based on the provided information, and may be used without <br /> qualification.A memorandum summarizing the data review for each of the sampling <br /> events is included in Appendix B. <br /> ' 5.0 Results <br /> This section presents the results of groundwater elevations and gradients,free-product <br /> ' observations, and analytical results. <br /> 5.1 Groundwater Elevations and Gradients <br /> ' Table 1 presents the depth-to-groundwater measurements and groundwater <br /> elevations. November 2010 groundwater elevation contour maps for the A-Zone and B- <br /> ' Zone wells are presented on Figures 3 and 4, respectively. March 2011 groundwater <br /> elevation contour maps for the A-Zone and B-Zone wells are presented on Figures 5 <br /> and 6, respectively. Groundwater elevations, contours and gradients are consistent <br /> ' with previous sampling events. The groundwater gradients for the 2010/2011 reporting <br /> period are summarized here: <br /> • The November 2010 data indicate the horizontal groundwater flow direction in the <br /> ' A-Zone was toward the north-northeast with a gradient of 0.003 feet/foot(fuft).The <br /> horizontal flow direction in the B-Zone was also toward the north-northeast with a <br /> gradient of 0.003 ft/ft. <br /> ' 0 The March 2011 data indicate the horizontal groundwater flow direction in the A- <br /> Zone was toward the northeast with a gradient of 0.003 fUft.The horizontal flow <br /> direction in the B-Zone was also toward the northeast with a gradient of 0.004 ft/ft. <br /> Pa e: 317 <br /> anal very,ee+nelm rec1ey_ne,Rw_azs.za1 1 dog 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.