Laserfiche WebLink
' Site Background Information Mel Bokides Petroleum - Linden <br /> Page 4of5 <br /> 1 <br /> VW1A on 06 October at a concentration of 0 39 µg11 and 0 29µg11,respectively No other analytes <br />' were detected at or above laboratory reporting limits in the soil vapor samples <br /> The shallow test results indicated the flow rate was initially measured at 42 cfm(standard cubic feet <br />' per minute) and the maximum observed was 75 cfm OV readings ranged from 923 ppm to 1,100 <br /> ppm Induced vacuum measured at the extraction well V W 1 B ranged from 20 to 32 inches of water <br /> On 06 October 2003, the lower screened vapor extraction test results had measured flow rates <br /> between 25 cfm and 31 cfm, a much lower flow was observed OV readings ranged from 12 ppm <br /> to 2 5 ppm, which was consistent across the pilot test Induced vacuum measured at the extraction <br /> well (VW IA) was always greater than 100 inches of water <br /> Duringthe shallow soil vapor extraction pilot test(18 September)the greatest induced vacuum was <br /> p <br /> measured in the observation point nearest the extraction well, at 0 60 inches of water in wells V W2 <br />' and VW3 The lowest vacuum was measured in MW-3,approximately 30 feet west of the extraction <br /> point and screened much lower in the stratigraphy at the site, however, sufficient induced vacuum <br /> I was observed in the monitoring wells to demonstrate that a vertical connection may exist across the <br /> vertically separated layers at the site <br /> . During the deeper soil vapor extraction pilot test (06 October) the greatest induced vacuum was <br /> measured in the observation point nearest the extraction well, at 0 45 inches of water in well <br /> MW-IR The lowest vacuum was measured in V W2 and V W 1 B, approximately 20 feet west of the <br /> extraction point and screened above the lower stratigraphy at the site Again, sufficient induced <br /> vacuum was observed in the monitoring wells and also in the upper soil vapor extraction wells, to <br /> demonstrate that a vertical connection may exist across the vertically separated layers at the site <br /> AGE plotted on a logarithmic scale the maximum vacuum measured at the observation points during <br /> the pilot test versus the distance from the extraction well The effective radius of influence was <br /> determined by drawing a best-fit line though these data points to correlate distance to vacuum data <br /> At a vacuum potential of 0 10 inches of water, the radius of influence is approximately 30 feet for <br /> the lower screened well (V W 1 A) and radius of influence is approximately 40 feet for the upper <br /> screened well (V W 1 B), at an induced vacuum potential of 10 inches of water, the radius of <br /> influence is 20 feet for well V W 1 A and approximately 25 feet for well V W 1 B Further, a vacuum <br /> potential of 10 0 inches of water the radius of influence is less than 10 feet Based upon an effective <br /> Ivacuum potential of 0 1 inches of water, the calculated effective radius of influence at the site will <br /> be 30 feet up to almost 40 feet for the upper screened vapor well The majority of the residual <br /> impacted soil would be collected within the 40 foot radius of influence <br />' Advanced GeoEnvironmental <br />