My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SPRECKELS
>
18800
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506460
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2020 1:22:09 PM
Creation date
5/14/2020 12:30:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0506460
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007440
FACILITY_NAME
ATHERTON KIRK/SPRECKELS
STREET_NUMBER
18800
STREET_NAME
SPRECKELS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
18800 SPRECKELS RD
P_LOCATION
04
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KLEINFELDER <br /> ' On September 23 1997, the RWQCB issued "Revised Waste Discharge Requirements <br /> for Spreckels Development Company, Former Spreckels Manteca Sugar Plant, Lime <br /> Pond Closure, San Joaquin County." The Revised Waste Discharge Requirements <br /> Order No. 97-204 (hereinafter "WDRs") detailed the requirements the RWQCB had on <br /> the property owner, including but not limited to a required Workplan for Evaluation <br /> ' Monitoring of Groundwater for the waste water ponds. <br /> In response to the RWQCB requirements, Kleinfelder was hired by Spreckels <br /> ' Development Company to develop the December 23, 1997 "Evaluation Monitoring <br /> Work Plan, former Spreckels Sugar Plant No. 2...." That work plan was reviewed by <br /> the CVRWQCB, which issued a letter dated October 30, 1998. That letter stated that <br /> ' the proposed wells; "screens should be not greater than 10 feet... should be set at a <br /> depth that intercepts the contaminant plume or is at the expected depth of the plume at <br /> the well's location. That depth should be determined by hydrologic modeling before <br /> ' drilling, Hydropunch data, or other means." Based on later discussions with Mr. <br /> Rosenbaum, the Hydropunch methodology was refined. <br /> On April 2, 1999, Kleinfelder abandoned monitoring well MW-6, due to constraints of the <br /> residential development. The well was later relocated just outside of the residential area <br /> ' in the future planter area in the northwest corner of the former Spreckels site. <br /> A total of 3 wells (MW-25, MW-26 and MW-27) and one relocated well (MW-6r) were <br /> installed between March 2, 1999 and March 29, 1999 in the northwestern portion of the <br /> subject site (Plate 2). Although the total depth of the wells were each approximately 50 <br /> feet bgs, the borings were advanced to total depths ranging from 50 to 85 feet bgs. Soil <br /> ' samples were continuously logged in borings MW-6r and MW-25 from the surface to <br /> depths of 55 and 85 feet bgs., respectively. Soil samples from boring MW-26 were <br /> continuously logged from 22 to 85 feet below ground surface (bgs). Soil samples from <br /> ' boring MW-27 were continuously logged from 25 to 50 feet bgs. A total of 41 discrete <br /> Hydropunch® groundwater samples were collected from the four new monitoring wells <br /> MW-6r and MW-25 through MW-26. The groundwater samples were collected from first <br /> t encountered groundwater (approximately 20 feet bgs.) and every five feet or change in <br /> lithology thereafter to the total depth of the borings. The discrete groundwater samples <br /> were field screened for assessment of the proposed screened interval of each well. <br /> ' The results of the abandonment of MW-6 and the installation of MW-6r, MW-25, MW- <br /> 26, and MW-27 were detailed in a report dated May 30, 2000 titled, "Additional <br /> Groundwater Assessment, Lime Pond Area, Former Spreckels Sugar Plant No. 2, <br /> ' 18800 South Spreckels Road, Manteca, California, (WDR Order # 97-204)." <br /> That report included the following conclusions and recommendations: <br /> ' 1) Groundwater flow direction was found to be generally towards the northwest at an <br /> approximate gradient of 0.0020 ft./ft. <br /> ' 2) Based on the field-test kit groundwater sampling results conducted during installation of four <br /> newer monitoring wells MW-6r, MW-25, MW-26, and MW-27, a discrete interval of relatively <br /> elevated chemical constituents were noted at a general depth ranging from 40 to 50 feet <br /> below ground surface. <br /> 20-3978-03.MN7/ST08R117 February 1,2008 <br /> ©2008 Kleinfelder <br /> ' Page 8 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.