My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SPRECKELS
>
18800
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506460
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2020 1:22:09 PM
Creation date
5/14/2020 12:30:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0506460
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007440
FACILITY_NAME
ATHERTON KIRK/SPRECKELS
STREET_NUMBER
18800
STREET_NAME
SPRECKELS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
18800 SPRECKELS RD
P_LOCATION
04
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
K L E I N F E L D E R <br /> 3) From correlation of cross-sections from the well logs with field test kit groundwater sampling <br /> results of the newer wells, it appears that a silty clay/clay aquitard at the approximate interval <br /> from 50 to 60 feet has limited vertical migration of selected constituents beneath the newer <br /> wells. <br /> 4) A comparison was made of analytical laboratory results between the highest concentrations of <br /> ' selected constituents in groundwater from background well MW-5 and the four newer wells <br /> (see Table 5.3.1). Based upon this comparison, most of the selected constituents in <br /> groundwater from the newer wells were below these background levels of well MW-5. The <br /> constituents which exceeded the background levels in the newer wells was not significantly <br /> ' elevated (order of magnitude increase). <br /> 5) Three of four isocontour maps of selected constituents in groundwater from the wells in the <br /> vicinity of the lime pond area show a significant decrease of selected constituents over <br /> distance in the cross-gradient and upgradient directions. A decrease in constituent levels in <br /> the downgradient direction to the northwest was less significant. <br /> 6) Although several aquitards were noted in the newer wells, no corresponding aquitards were <br /> noted from review of wells logs of older wells (MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 and MW-5). It is unknown <br /> if this may be the result of the degree of care and precision taken in said logging. <br /> 7) Kleinfelder understands that as of the date of this report approximately 100 percent of the <br /> spent lime have been reused in the engineered fill for the proposed industrial/commercial <br /> areas of the site. According to an October 7, 1998 letter from the Regional Water Quality <br /> Control Board, the reuse of lime material as engineered fill complies with the current WDRs. <br /> ' It is Kleinfelder's opinion that after closure of the lime ponds, that groundwater concentrations <br /> of the constituents of concern in the vicinity of the former lime ponds will decrease over time. <br /> Additionally, further development over the lime pond area will help to inhibit infiltration of an <br /> constituents of concern still present in the soil. <br /> 8) Kleinfelder recommends further monitoring in the vicinity of the lime pond area to assess if <br /> pond closure and redevelopment will lead to a further decrease of constituents of concern in <br /> groundwater. On behalf of Bing Kirk of Atherton Kirk Development Company, Kleinfelder <br /> respectfully requests that the monitoring frequency be decreased from a quarterly to a semi- <br /> annual basis. <br /> 9) A copy of this report should be submitted to the San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> Department Environmental Health Division (PHS/EHD) and the Central Valley Office of the <br /> State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board by Atherton-Kirk for their review and <br /> consideration. <br /> On October 8th, 13th, and 28th, 1999 and May 12, 2000, Kleinfelder collected soil <br /> ' confirmation samples beneath the former lime ponds, and collected soil confirmation <br /> samples of the in-place mix (October 28th, 1999), respectively at the former Spreckels site <br /> in Manteca, California. Based on the results of the chemical analyses conducted on the <br /> ' samples analyzed, the following conclusions were detailed in Kleinfelder's report titled <br /> "Confirmation Sampling, Removal of Spent Lime Ponds, Former Spreckels Sugar Plant <br /> No. 2...." dated September 26, 2000: <br /> 1) As evidenced by the confirmation samples' concentrations, the former lime ponds have been <br /> excavated to concentrations, which are generally at or below the concentrations of the approved <br /> ' "mix." Therefore, the ponds appear adequately excavated. <br /> 2) The lime ponds have been excavated, and the spent lime primarily reused on site in the manner <br /> approved by the RWQCB. <br /> ' 20-3978-03.MN7/ST08R117 February 1,2008 <br /> 0 2008 Kleinfelder Page 9 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.