Laserfiche WebLink
California Regional Water Quality Control Bo <br /> Central Valle <br /> y Region <br /> Winston H.Hickox Robert Schneider,Chair .. _r <br /> Secretary for Gray Davis <br /> Environmental Sacramento Main Office <br /> Protection Internet Address: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwgcb5 Governor <br /> 3443 Routier Road,Suite A,Sacramento,California 95827-3003 <br /> Phone(916)255-3000•FAX(916)255-3015 <br /> TO: Technical Staff FROM: Jon B. Marshack, D.Env. <br /> Redding, Fresno, and Sacramento <br /> Staff Environmental Scientist <br /> Offices Program Support Unit <br /> DATE: 20 August 2002 SIGNATURE: <br /> SUBJECT: SELECTING NUMERICAL RECEIVING WATER QUALITY LIMITS' <br /> The text at the beginning of the report,4 Compilation of Water Quality Goals provides information on <br /> how numerical limits may be used to translate narrative water quality objectives into receiving water <br /> limits. Included are recommendations and examples to help users of the report select appropriate limits. <br /> However, it appears that staff in the various Regional Board's programs do not select receiving water <br /> limits in a consistent manner. In some cases, limits are chosen that do not fully implement all applicable <br /> water quality objectives. In other cases, limits are chosen that would not stand up to legal challenge. <br /> To increase consistency in the selection of water quality limits, this memorandum recommends the use <br /> of default rules or algorithms for selecting numerical limits to comply with water quality objectives and <br /> promulgated water quality criteria. These algorithms are based on a few guiding principles designed to <br /> support the selection of appropriate water quality based limits. Other policies and regulations, such as <br /> the Antidegradation Policy, the Site Assessment and Cleanup Policy, and NPDES regulations require <br /> that technology based limits and background levels also be considered in determining the final water <br /> quality limits appropriate for a particular situation. <br /> Guiding Principles <br /> The following principles guide the derivation of the recommended algorithms. To be defensible, <br /> receiving water limits should be chosen so as to implement all applicable water quality objectives and <br /> promulgated water quality criteria. For each constituent of concern, the process involves three steps: <br /> 1) Select a single numerical limit to satisfy each water quality objective or relevant portion thereof.2 <br /> 2) To satisfy all applicable objectives, select the lowest of the numerical limits from step (1). <br /> t This memorandum is not intended to provide guidance on effluent limits,which are derived from water quality based and <br /> z technology based considerations using discharge-specific factors and according to applicable regulations and policies. <br /> For example,compliance with the narrative toxicity objective for surface water normally involves selection of one limit <br /> to protect aquatic life and another limit to protect human health. <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> �a Recycled Paper <br /> The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. <br /> For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs,see our Web-site at http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwgcb5 <br />