Laserfiche WebLink
Neenah Paper,Inc. • March 28,2007 <br /> Response to RWQCB Letter Page 2 of 3 <br /> Page 7, Section 4, Water Supply Well Monitoring <br /> The paragraph incorrectly states that Neenah Paper has five process water supply <br /> wells (PW-4 through PW-8). Production wells PW-4 and PW-5 do not belong to <br /> Neenah Paper; they are the property of the adjacent Ripon Cogeneration plant. <br /> Neenah Paper, however, will continue to monitor the wells per the proposed <br /> monitoring schedule. <br /> Page 8, Section 5, Groundwater <br /> Paragraph 2, well MW-26C should be M-26-C. <br /> Paragraph 5, quarterly laboratory tests: Well TH-3 is currently excluded from this <br /> requirement because it is screened similarly to well PW-4 (which is monitored <br /> quarterly) and which is located 40 feet away from TH-3. Samples from TH-3 <br /> should not be analyzed quarterly. <br /> Paragraph 6, annual laboratory tests: Well M-10-C should be M-19-C (M-10-C is <br /> not located on FR). Additionally, well TH-3 should be excluded form this set for <br /> the reasons listed above. <br /> Page 9, Table VI— Water Quality Protection Standards <br /> Neenah Paper is not requesting any change here but notes that Neenah Paper's <br /> effluent discharge and subsequent land spreading is within it's discharge permit. <br /> Nonetheless, as you know,Neenah Paper is committed to working on continual <br /> improvements in TDS concentrations with the Regional Board. <br /> Page 10, Section 6, Facility Monitoring, subsection a, Facility Inspection. <br /> Language was submitted on March 19 while visiting the Central Valley Region of <br /> the California Water Quality Control Board. The intent of the language was to <br /> allow for an extended timeline for large repairs to the water treatment system. The <br /> submitted language was to delete the last two sentences and replace as follows: <br /> "All necessary construction, maintenance, or repairs shall either be <br /> completed or a detailed plan, describing action and expected date of <br /> completion, shall be submitted by October 31St. The discharger shall submit <br /> an annual report describing the results of the inspection and repair measures <br /> proposed and/or implemented, including available photographs of the <br /> problem and the timeliness for repairs." <br /> 003044.00 Lawrence&Associates <br /> W.IClientslFoxRiverlProposed changes to Revised Monitoring and Reporting Programdoc <br />