My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT - PHASE I REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SIXTH
>
50
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0523379
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT - PHASE I REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2020 9:19:47 AM
Creation date
5/15/2020 9:09:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
DRAFT - PHASE I REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0523379
PE
2959
FACILITY_ID
FA0015797
FACILITY_NAME
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD - BOW TIE
STREET_NUMBER
50
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
SIXTH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
23515007
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
50 W SIXTH ST
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants <br /> Section 4: Quality Assurance/Quality Control <br /> 4.1 Field Quality Assurance/Quality Control <br /> In addition to equipment decontamination between samples and sampling locations, quality <br /> assurance/quality control (QA/QC) measures employed during the field work included collecting <br /> and analyzing duplicate reconnaissance groundwater samples. Duplicate groundwater samples <br /> were collected from Borings OU5-AO110-S12 and OU5-AO110-S15. The analytical results from <br /> the duplicate samples were comparable with the results from the primary samples. <br /> In addition, equipment blanks were collected each day from decontaminated soil and <br /> groundwater sampling equipment. Soil equipment blanks were collected by pouring distilled <br /> water over and through a cleaned sample barrel and liner. Groundwater equipment blanks were <br /> collected by pouring the distilled water over the decontaminated steel check valve. The blank <br /> ' samples were contained in appropriate sample containers and submitted for the same analyses <br /> as the soil and groundwater samples collected that day. <br /> Analytes were detected at concentrations exceeding analytical reporting limits in four of the <br /> 15 equipment blank samples, as described below. <br /> • OU5-AO19-GW-3-EB. TPHd was detected at a concentration of 52 pg/I in this sample <br /> collected from the groundwater sampling equipment. This sample was collected after <br /> completing borings OU5-AO19-S26, OU5-AO19-S27, and OU5-AO19-S28. TPHd was <br /> reported in groundwater samples from these borings at concentrations of 130 pg/l, 67 pg/I, <br /> ' and 77 pg/l, respectively. <br /> OU5-AOI10-S-6-EB. TPHd was detected at 51 pg/I in this sample collected from the soil <br /> sampling equipment. TPHd concentrations in soil samples collected that day ranged from <br /> less than the analytical reporting limit to 190 mg/kg, and when detected, TPHd was usually <br /> accompanied by TPHmo. <br /> • OU2-AO17-S-13-EB. Zinc was detected at 0.075 mg/I in this sample collected from the soil <br /> sampling equipment. In soil samples collected that day, zinc was detected at concentrations <br /> ranging from 37 mg/kg to 360 mg/kg. <br /> • OU4-S-14-EB. TPHd was detected at 52 pg/I and nickel was detected at 0.0085 mg/I in this <br /> sample collected from the soil sampling equipment. TPHd concentrations in soil samples <br /> collected that day ranged from less than reporting limit to 3,900 mg/kg, and when detected, <br /> TPHd was usually accompanied by TPHmo. Nickel concentrations in soil samples collected <br /> that day range from 16 mg/kg to 43 mg/kg. <br /> The TPHd detected in one of the groundwater equipment blanks does not significantly affect the <br /> findings or conclusions of the investigation. Even if the 52 pg/I TPHd detected in the equipment <br /> blank was subtracted from the TPHd concentrations detected in the three groundwater samples <br /> collected that day, the interpreted TPHd distribution, discussed in detail in the following <br /> sections, would not change appreciably. <br /> DRAFT Phase 1 Remedial Investigation Report Page 19 <br /> Former Tracy Railyard, Tracy, California <br /> g:1is-groupladminjo610510565777.18_uprr109-reportsVi rptAeddoc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.