My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008332
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SANTA FE
>
23569
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541936
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008332
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 12:34:06 PM
Creation date
5/18/2020 11:04:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008332
RECORD_ID
PR0541936
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0006149
FACILITY_NAME
RANCH MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
23569
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SANTA FE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIVERBANK
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
23569 S SANTA FE RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EM 1110-1-4001 <br /> 3 Jun 02 <br /> Table 9.1 <br /> Possible Criteria to be Considered in Evaluating Shutdown of SVEIBV System <br /> Sod Sample Analysis Recommended,provided proper sampling strategy and methods used <br /> • Sod constituents collected from the area being remediated indicated levels below regulatory requirements or levels of nondetection <br /> (confirmatory analyses) <br /> • If soil constituents collected from the area being remediated indicate levels above regulatory requirements and operation times and <br /> cost have been exceeded the operator may request a variance from the regulatory agency to accept remediated levels(refer <br /> to paragraph 9-5,Evaluation of Results) <br /> b Shutdown strategies can be based on <br /> • Soil sampling results compared to specific regulatory or nsk-based soil concentration standards <br /> • Soil gas sampling,compared to specific soil gas concentration standards <br /> • Soil gas concentration rebound following shutdown for reasonable period(see Section 9-9 and <br /> Appendix F) <br /> • For BV systems,attainment of low respiration rates <br /> In all cases,the design of both the remediation and the monitoring system must be evaluated to ensure it is <br /> in accordance with good practice,as defined by this manual <br /> C Shutdown strategies based on the need to protect ground water are becoming more common In <br /> most cases,the removal of contaminant mass in the vadose zone must continue until the residual mass will <br /> not leach to the ground water in quantities that would cause exceedance of ground water quality standards <br /> This typically is evaluated through the use of leaching models and the assumption that some mixing of the <br /> leachate and ground water occurs below the water table The details of this mixing(i e ,thickness of <br /> mixing zone,etc )are often the subject of debate It is unrealistic to neglect this mixing,but it is not <br /> conservative to overestimate the thickness of the mixing zone in the absence of hydrogeologic data The <br /> observed thickness of the ground water plume or the typical length of either monitoring well screens or <br /> production well screens may be a basis for the thickness of the mixing zone The acceptable soil <br /> concentration may be determined through the modeling(DiGiulio et at , 1999),or,by assuming equilibnum <br /> between phases,an acceptable soil gas concentration can also be computed At an Air Force Base in <br /> California, further analysis has been done to determine the acceptable soil remediation by SVE considering <br /> the cost of simultaneous ground water extraction The evaluation considers the cost of removing additional <br /> mass through the SVE system,versus the additional cost for future ground water extraction accounting for <br /> the added leachate from the vadose zone if SVE is stopped The operation of the SVE system would <br /> continue only if the reduction in the cost of future ground water extraction was more than the cost of the <br /> additional SVE This requires the use of both vadose zone leaching and ground water contaminant <br /> transport models and is probably justified only on larger SVE sites where ground water is already impacted <br /> d The USACE Remediation System Evaluatton process can also be used to help identify when the <br /> system may be ready for shutdown or when enhancements may be necessary to reach remediation goals <br /> Refer to the Soil Vapor Extraction Subsurface Performance checklist available at <br /> iittp,/w�tiw Eng nonmcrit it �rs�ce ac my n�rl'ltbiaru�cl� rs�c hl.rrsc�fil`html The checklist guides the user in <br /> analysts of data to determine if the system has reached a limitation,if operation needs to be changed to <br /> 9-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.